Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Chen J, Ahmad R, Suenaga H, Li W, Swain M, Li Q
    J Biomech, 2015 Feb 5;48(3):512-9.
    PMID: 25560272 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.043
    Although implant-retained overdenture allows edentulous patients to take higher occlusal forces than the conventional complete dentures, the biomechanical influences have not been explored yet. Clinically, there is limited knowledge and means for predicting localized bone remodelling after denture treatment with and without implant support. By using finite element (FE) analysis, this article provides an in-silico approach to exploring the treatment effects on the oral mucosa and potential resorption of residual ridge under three different denture configurations in a patient-specific manner. Based on cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans, a 3D heterogeneous FE model was created; and the supportive tissue, mucosa, was characterized as a hyperelastic material. A measured occlusal load (63N) was applied onto three virtual models, namely complete denture, two and four implant-retained overdentures. Clinically, the bone resorption was measured after one year in the two implant-retained overdenture treatment. Despite the improved stability and enhanced masticatory function, the implant-retained overdentures demonstrated higher hydrostatic stress in mucosa (43.6kPa and 39.9kPa for two and four implants) at the posterior ends of the mandible due to the cantilever effect, than the complete denture (33.4kPa). Hydrostatic pressure in the mucosa signifies a critical indicator and can be correlated with clinically measured bone resorption, pointing to severer mandibular ridge resorption posteriorly with implant-retained overdentures. This study provides a biomechanical basis for denture treatment planning to improve long-term outcomes with minimal residual ridge resorption.
    Matched MeSH terms: Denture Retention/instrumentation*
  2. Ling BC
    Quintessence Int, 1995 Dec;26(12):871-7.
    PMID: 8596818
    This article presents an alternative to the conventional swing-lock de sign of removable partial denture construction. It incorporates the principles of sectional dentures as well as the swing-lock concept and overcomes some of the limitations of conventional swing-lock dentures. I-bar struts and stainless steel keepers form part of the first section of the denture. The second part of the denture consists of the denture base with the artificial teeth and magnetic retention units. This system has been used successfully in a number of patients whose situations were suitable for the conventional swing-lock design.
    Matched MeSH terms: Denture Retention/instrumentation*
  3. Baig MR, Rajan G
    J Oral Implantol, 2010;36(1):31-5.
    PMID: 20218868 DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00062
    This article describes the dental implant-based rehabilitation of a partially edentulous patient with a unilateral maxillary dento-alveolar defect. A screw-retained prosthesis with a modified design was fabricated on zygomatic and regular dental implants. One section of the implant prosthesis has cemented crowns and the other section is conventional screw-retained. The design of the prosthesis overcame the hard and soft tissue deficit and provided the desired esthetics.
    Matched MeSH terms: Denture Retention/instrumentation*
  4. Baig MR, Gunaseelan R
    J Oral Implantol, 2012 Apr;38(2):149-53.
    PMID: 20932151 DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00089
    Passive fit of a long-span screw-retained implant prosthesis is an important criteria for the success of the restoration. This article describes a technique for fabricating a ceramometal implant fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) for a long-span partially edentulous situation by altering the conventional screw-retained design. The possibility of a passive fit is maximized by intraoral luting of the cast frame to milled abutments, and the potential framework distortion during fabrication is compensated to a major extent. Retrievability is ensured by screw retention of the prosthesis to the implants. Compared with conventional porcelain fused to metal screw-retained FDP, this prosthesis is relatively inexpensive to fabricate.
    Matched MeSH terms: Denture Retention/instrumentation*
  5. Baig MR, Rajan G
    J Oral Implantol, 2010;36(3):219-23.
    PMID: 20553176 DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00048
    Abstract This article describes the clinical and laboratory procedures involved in the fabrication of laboratory-processed, provisional, screw-retained, implant-supported maxillary and mandibular fixed complete dentures incorporating a cast metal reinforcement for immediate loading of implants. Precise fit is achieved by intraoral luting of the cast frame to milled abutments. Effective splinting of all implants is attained by the metal substructure and retrievability is provided by the screw-retention of the prosthesis.
    Matched MeSH terms: Denture Retention/instrumentation
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links