Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University Putra Malaysia, UPM, 43400, Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia. Electronic address: [email protected]
  • 2 Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University Putra Malaysia, UPM, 43400, Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Putra Malaysia, UPM, 43400 Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  • 4 Department of Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 5 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, International Medical University, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 6 Center for Southeast Asia Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
  • 7 Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University Putra Malaysia, UPM, 43400, Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia; Food safety and Food Integrity, Institute of Tropical Agriculture Security (ITAFoS), University Putra Malaysia, UPM, 43400 Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
Int J Food Microbiol, 2018 Nov 02;284:112-119.
PMID: 30142576 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.08.012

Abstract

Kitchen mishandling practices contribute to a large number of foodborne illnesses. In this study, the transfer and cross-contamination potential of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from bloody clams to ready-to-eat food (lettuce) was assessed. Three scenarios were investigated: 1) direct cross-contamination, the transfer of V. parahaemolyticus from bloody clams to non-food contact surfaces (hands and kitchen utensils) to lettuce (via slicing), was evaluated; 2) perfunctory decontamination, the efficacy of two superficial cleaning treatments: a) rinsing in a pail of water, and b) wiping with a kitchen towel, were determined; and 3) secondary cross-contamination, the microbial transfer from cleaning residuals (wash water or stained kitchen towel) to lettuce was assessed. The mean of percent transfer rates through direct contact was 3.6%, and an average of 3.5% of total V. parahaemolyticus was recovered from sliced lettuce. The attempted treatments reduced the transferred population by 99.0% (rinsing) and 94.5% (wiping), and the relative amount of V. parahaemolyticus on sliced lettuce was reduced to 0.008%. V. parahaemolyticus exposure via secondary cross-contamination was marginal. The relative amount of V. parahaemolyticus recovered from washed lettuce was 0.07%, and the transfers from stained kitchen towel to lettuce were insubstantial. Our study highlights that V. parahaemolyticus was readily spread in the kitchen, potentially through sharing of non-food contact surfaces. Results from this study can be used to better understand and potentially raising the awareness of proper handling practices to avert the spread of foodborne pathogens.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.