METHOD: This study was conducted on 19 healthy subjects (non-habitual 8; habitual 11), non-smoking and between 21 and 30 years of age. Using laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG), three areas of optical nerve head were analyzed which are vessel, tissue, and overall, each with ten pulse waveform parameters, namely mean blur rate (MBR), fluctuation, skew, blowout score (BOS), blowout time (BOT), rising rate, falling rate, flow acceleration index (FAI), acceleration time index (ATI), and resistive index (RI). Two-way mixed ANOVA was used to determine the difference between every two groups where p
METHOD: This prospective study conducted on 24 feet with CTEV (18 babies) with Pirani score ranging between 2 to 6. Eighteen normal babies (36 feet) were selected as control. We used Color Doppler Ultrasound to assess dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial arteries before initiating the treatment. Second ultrasound was performed in study group upon completion of Ponseti treatment.
RESULTS: The patients were from one week to 15 weeks of life. Dorsalis pedis arterial flows were absent in 7 clubfeet (29.1%) while the remaining 17 clubfeet (70.8%) had normal flow. There was a significant association between Pirani severity score and vascular status in congenital clubfoot. There was a higher proportion of clubfeet having abnormal vascularity when the Pirani severity score was 5 and more. In study group, posterior tibial arteries were detectable and patent in all feet. All normal feet in control group had normal arterial flow. There was a significant difference in vascular flow before and after the Ponseti treatment (p 0.031).
CONCLUSION: The study concludes that there is an association between Pirani severity score and arterial deficiency in CTEV. Ponseti treatment is safe in CTEV with arterial deficiency and able to reconstitute the arterial flow in majority of cases.
METHODS: Thirty-two adults with recurrent, nonspecific LBP were randomized into two groups: Appendicular BFR exercise (BFR exercise) or control exercise (CON exercise). All participants trained (two times per week) for 10 wk, with a 12-wk follow-up. Participants performed three sets of leg extension (LE), plantar flexion (PF), and elbow flexion (EF) exercises followed by low-load TE exercise without BFR. Outcome measures included magnetic resonance imaging-derived muscle size (quadriceps and TE), strength (LE, PF, EF, and TE), and endurance (LE and TE).
RESULTS: There was no evidence for a cross-transfer of effect to the TE. There was also no statistically significant enhancement of limb skeletal muscle size or function of BFR relative to CON exercise at any time point; though, moderate effect sizes for BFR exercise were observed for enhanced muscle size and strength in the leg extensors.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-load BFR exercise of the appendicular muscles did not result in a cross-transfer of effect to the TE musculature. There was also no significant benefit of low-load BFR exercise on the appendicular muscle size and function, suggesting no benefit from low-load BFR exercise in adults with recurrent, nonspecific LBP.