Displaying all 10 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Kow CS, Hasan SS
    J Med Virol, 2021 02;93(2):695-697.
    PMID: 32902868 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26498
    Matched MeSH terms: Metformin/adverse effects*
  2. Robinson S, Kwan Z, Tang MM
    Dermatol Ther, 2019 07;32(4):e12953.
    PMID: 31044492 DOI: 10.1111/dth.12953
    Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and essential amino acids activate the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), the main nutrient-sensitive kinase. Metformin, through inhibition of mTORC1 may improve acne. A 12-week, randomized, open-labeled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of metformin as an adjunct for moderate to severe facial acne. In total, 84 patients received either oral tetracycline 250 mg bd and topical benzoyl peroxide 2.5% with or without metformin 850 mg daily. Evaluations constituted lesion counts, the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI), metabolic parameters and treatment success rate (Investigators Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 or improvement of two grades). Treatment success rates were higher in the metformin group (66.7% vs. 43.2%; p = .04). The mean percentage reduction from baseline in total lesion counts at Week 12 was greater in the metformin group (71.4% vs. 65.3%; p = .278). The CADI scores showed a greater mean reduction in the metformin group (4.82 vs. 4.22; p = .451). Metformin was equally efficacious in improving acne in lean and overweight subjects. Gastrointestinal symptoms were noted in 31.7% of subjects on metformin. This study presents favorable data for metformin as an adjunct for acne treatment. Further randomized placebo-controlled studies are required.
    Matched MeSH terms: Metformin/adverse effects
  3. Azar ST, Echtay A, Wan Bebakar WM, Al Araj S, Berrah A, Omar M, et al.
    Diabetes Obes Metab, 2016 10;18(10):1025-33.
    PMID: 27376711 DOI: 10.1111/dom.12733
    AIMS: Compare effects of liraglutide 1.8 mg and sulphonylurea, both combined with metformin, on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) fasting during Ramadan.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this up to 33-week, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group trial, adults [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7%-10% (53-86 mmol/mol); body mass index ≥20 kg/m(2) ; intent to fast] were randomized (1:1) ≥10 weeks before Ramadan to either switch to once-daily liraglutide (final dose 1.8 mg) or continue pre-trial sulphonylurea at maximum tolerated dose, both with metformin.

    PRIMARY ENDPOINT: change in fructosamine, a validated marker of short-term glycaemic control, during Ramadan.

    RESULTS: Similar reductions in fructosamine levels were observed for both groups during Ramadan [liraglutide (-12.8 µmol/L); sulphonylurea (-16.4 µmol/L); estimated treatment difference (ETD) 3.51 µmol/L (95% CI: -5.26; 12.28); p = 0.43], despite lower fructosamine levels in the liraglutide group at start of Ramadan. Fewer documented symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were reported in liraglutide-treated (2%, three subjects) versus sulphonylurea-treated patients (11%, 18 subjects). No severe hypoglycaemic episodes were reported by either group. Body weight decreased more during Ramadan with liraglutide (ETD: -0.54 kg; 95% CI: -0.94;-0.14; p = 0.0091). The proportion of patients reporting adverse events was similar between groups. Liraglutide led to greater HbA1c reduction [ETD: -0.59% (-6.40 mmol/mol), 95% CI: -0.79; -0.38%; -8.63; -4.17 mmol/mol; p 

    Matched MeSH terms: Metformin/adverse effects
  4. Dinesh KU, Subish P, Pranaya M, Shankar PR, Anil SK, Durga B
    Med J Malaysia, 2007 Oct;62(4):294-8.
    PMID: 18551932
    A prospective study was conducted at Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal to identify and analyze the pattern of the potential DDIs (drug-drug interaction) in diabetes patients. A total of 182 patients who were prescribed 685 drugs (average, 3.76 drugs per prescription) were enrolled. Patients 51 to 60 years of age had a higher risk [43 patients, or (23.6%)] of developing DDIs. It was found that 174 (92.1%) of the potential DDIs were of "moderate" severity. Cardiovascular drugs carried a risk of DDIs (187 drugs, or 49.5%). The most common potential DDI observed was between metformin and enalapril (n = 64).
    Matched MeSH terms: Metformin/adverse effects
  5. Wan Seman WJ, Kori N, Rajoo S, Othman H, Mohd Noor N, Wahab NA, et al.
    Diabetes Obes Metab, 2016 06;18(6):628-32.
    PMID: 26889911 DOI: 10.1111/dom.12649
    The aim of the present study was to assess the hypoglycaemia risk and safety of dapagliflozin compared with sulphonylurea during the fasting month of Ramadan. In this 12-week, randomized, open-label, two-arm parallel group study, 110 patients with type 2 diabetes who were receiving sulphonylurea and metformin were randomized either to receive 10 mg (n = 58) of dapagliflozin daily or to continue receiving sulphonylurea (n = 52). The primary outcome was to compare the effects of dapagliflozin and sulphonylurea on the proportions of patients with at least one episode of hypoglycaemia during Ramadan, as well as to assess the safety of dapagliflozin when used to treat patients observing Ramadan. A lower proportion of patients had reported or documented hypoglycaemia in the dapagliflozin group than in the sulphonylurea group: 4 (6.9%) versus 15 (28.8%); p = 0.002. The relative risk of any reported or documented hypoglycaemia in the 4th week of Ramadan was significantly lower in the dapagliflozin group: RR=0.24, 95%CI: 0.09, 0.68; p=0.002. No significance differences were observed between the two groups regarding postural hypotension (13.8 vs 3.8%; p = 0.210) or urinary tract infections (10.3 vs 3.8%; p = 0.277). In conclusion, fewer patients exhibited hypoglycaemia in the dapagliflozin group than in the sulphonylurea group.
    Matched MeSH terms: Metformin/adverse effects
  6. Yu Pan C, Han P, Liu X, Yan S, Feng P, Zhou Z, et al.
    Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2014 Nov;30(8):726-35.
    PMID: 24639432 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2541
    BACKGROUND: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the once-daily glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, lixisenatide, in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin ± sulfonylurea.
    METHODS: In this 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational study, patients were randomized to lixisenatide 20 µg once daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was absolute change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c ) from baseline to week 24.
    RESULTS: A total of 391 patients were randomized. Lixisenatide significantly reduced HbA1c levels compared with placebo (LS mean difference: -0.36%, p = 0.0004). A significantly higher proportion of lixisenatide-treated patients achieved HbA1c targets of <7% (p = 0.003) and ≤6.5% (p = 0.001) versus placebo. Lixisenatide was associated with a statistically significant reduction in 2-h postprandial plasma glucose after a standardized breakfast versus placebo (LS mean difference: -4.28 mmol/L, p metformin ± sulfonylurea, lixisenatide significantly improved glycaemic control and was well tolerated during the 24-week study.
    TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01169779.
    KEYWORDS: Asia; glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists; lixisenatide; type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)
    Matched MeSH terms: Metformin/adverse effects
  7. Hasan SS, Kow CS, Bain A, Kavanagh S, Merchant HA, Hadi MA
    Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2021 Feb;22(2):229-240.
    PMID: 33054481 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1837114
    INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is one of the most prevalent comorbidities identified in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This article aims to discuss the pharmacotherapeutic considerations for the management of diabetes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

    AREAS COVERED: We discussed various aspects of pharmacotherapeutic management in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: (i) susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 among individuals with diabetes, (ii) glycemic goals for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and concurrent diabetes, (iii) pharmacological treatment considerations for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and concurrent diabetes.

    EXPERT OPINION: The glycemic goals in patients with COVID-19 and concurrent type 1 (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are to avoid disruption of stable metabolic state, maintain optimal glycemic control, and prevent adverse glycemic events. Patients with T1DM require insulin therapy at all times to prevent ketosis. The management strategies for patients with T2DM include temporary discontinuation of certain oral antidiabetic agents and consideration for insulin therapy. Patients with T2DM who are relatively stable and able to eat regularly may continue with oral antidiabetic agents if glycemic control is satisfactory. Hyperglycemia may develop in patients with systemic corticosteroid treatment and should be managed upon accordingly.

    Matched MeSH terms: Metformin/adverse effects
  8. Tamborlane WV, Barrientos-Pérez M, Fainberg U, Frimer-Larsen H, Hafez M, Hale PM, et al.
    N Engl J Med, 2019 Aug 15;381(7):637-646.
    PMID: 31034184 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903822
    BACKGROUND: Metformin is the regulatory-approved treatment of choice for most youth with type 2 diabetes early in the disease. However, early loss of glycemic control has been observed with metformin monotherapy. Whether liraglutide added to metformin (with or without basal insulin treatment) is safe and effective in youth with type 2 diabetes is unknown.

    METHODS: Patients who were 10 to less than 17 years of age were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive subcutaneous liraglutide (up to 1.8 mg per day) or placebo for a 26-week double-blind period, followed by a 26-week open-label extension period. Inclusion criteria were a body-mass index greater than the 85th percentile and a glycated hemoglobin level between 7.0 and 11.0% if the patients were being treated with diet and exercise alone or between 6.5 and 11.0% if they were being treated with metformin (with or without insulin). All the patients received metformin during the trial. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the glycated hemoglobin level after 26 weeks. Secondary end points included the change in fasting plasma glucose level. Safety was assessed throughout the course of the trial.

    RESULTS: Of 135 patients who underwent randomization, 134 received at least one dose of liraglutide (66 patients) or placebo (68 patients). Demographic characteristics were similar in the two groups (mean age, 14.6 years). At the 26-week analysis of the primary efficacy end point, the mean glycated hemoglobin level had decreased by 0.64 percentage points with liraglutide and increased by 0.42 percentage points with placebo, for an estimated treatment difference of -1.06 percentage points (P<0.001); the difference increased to -1.30 percentage points by 52 weeks. The fasting plasma glucose level had decreased at both time points in the liraglutide group but had increased in the placebo group. The number of patients who reported adverse events was similar in the two groups (56 [84.8%] with liraglutide and 55 [80.9%] with placebo), but the overall rates of adverse events and gastrointestinal adverse events were higher with liraglutide.

    CONCLUSIONS: In children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide, at a dose of up to 1.8 mg per day (added to metformin, with or without basal insulin), was efficacious in improving glycemic control over 52 weeks. This efficacy came at the cost of an increased frequency of gastrointestinal adverse events. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; Ellipse ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01541215.).

    Matched MeSH terms: Metformin/adverse effects
  9. Ji L, Li L, Kuang J, Yang T, Kim DJ, Kadir AA, et al.
    Diabetes Obes Metab, 2017 05;19(5):754-758.
    PMID: 28075066 DOI: 10.1111/dom.12875
    This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 26 weeks of twice-daily (BID) alogliptin + metformin fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients aged 18 to 75 years with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7.5% to 10.0% after ≥2 months of diet and exercise and a 4-week placebo run-in were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to placebo, alogliptin 12.5 mg BID, metformin 500 mg BID or alogliptin 12.5 mg plus metformin 500 mg FDC BID. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment (Week 26). In total, 647 patients were randomized. The least-squares mean change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26 was -0.19% with placebo, -0.86% with alogliptin, -1.04% with metformin and -1.53% with alogliptin + metformin FDC. Alogliptin + metformin FDC was significantly more effective ( P  metformin alone. The safety profile of alogliptin + metformin FDC was similar to that of the individual components alogliptin and metformin. The study demonstrated that treatment with alogliptin + metformin FDC BID resulted in better glycaemic control than either monotherapy and was well tolerated in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Matched MeSH terms: Metformin/adverse effects
  10. Shafiee MN, Malik DA, Yunos RI, Atiomo W, Omar MH, Ghani NA, et al.
    Gynecol Endocrinol, 2015 Apr;31(4):286-90.
    PMID: 25495168 DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2014.989982
    The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to determine the effects of three-month Metformin therapy on the expression of tumor-regulatory genes (p53, cyclin D2 and BCL-2) in the endometrium of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). A total of 40 women, aged between 21 and 45 years with PCOS (Rotterdam criteria) were recruited. The participants were assessed at pre- and 3-month-post-Metformin therapy for the menstrual regularities, weight reduction, Ferriman Galway scores, fasting blood glucose (FBG), total cholesterol, LDL, HDL and p53, BCL-2 and cyclin D2 gene expression. Five participants conceived spontaneously after the initial recruitment. Majority (68%) resumed regular menstrual cycles after Metformin. There were significant reduction in BMI (p = 0.001), weight (p = 0.001) and Ferriman Galway scores (p = 0.001). A significant improvement was seen in mean FBG (p = 0.002), total cholesterol (p = 0.001), LDL (p = 0.003) and HDL cholesterol levels (p = 0.015). Tumor suppressor gene (p53) was significantly up-regulated after Metformin (10 out of 14 women), with p value 0.016. BCL-2 and cyclin D2 (oncogenes) were slightly up-regulated without significant difference (p = 0.119 and 0.155, respectively). In conclusion, Metformin therapy improved clinical and metabolic parameters in women with PCOS and up-regulated p53 tumor suppressor gene significantly. Further studies are however required to independently validate our findings.
    Matched MeSH terms: Metformin/adverse effects
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links