MyMedR

Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Colonoscopy in elderly Asians: a prospective evaluation in routine clinical practice

Ma WT, Mahadeva S, Kunanayagam S, Poi PJ, Goh KL

J Dig Dis, 2007 May;8(2):77-81.
PMID: 17532819

Colonoscopy is believed to be more complicated in elderly patients in Western countries. It is uncertain if the situation holds true among Asians. This study is to determine differences in colonoscopy performance and sedation complications between patients aged<65 years and those>or=65 years of age in an Asian population.

Matched MeSH terms: Conscious Sedation/adverse effects*
Impairment of psychomotor responses after conscious sedation in cirrhotic patients undergoing therapeutic upper GI endoscopy

Vasudevan AE, Goh KL, Bulgiba AM

Am J Gastroenterol, 2002 Jul;97(7):1717-21.
PMID: 12135024

The aim of this study was to determine whether the number connection test (NCT) times of a group of cirrhotic patients without clinically overt hepatic encephalopathy and a group of healthy patients without liver disease who were undergoing endoscopy were prolonged after sedation with short acting i.v. benzodiazepines.

Matched MeSH terms: Conscious Sedation/adverse effects*
Fulltext Tolerance and safety to colonoscopy with conscious sedation in Malaysian adults

Ma WT, Mahadeva S, Quek KF, Goh KL

Med J Malaysia, 2007 Oct;62(4):313-8.
PMID: 18551936 MyJurnal

Tolerance to colonoscopy varies between populations and data from the South East Asian region is lacking. We aimed to determine tolerance and safety with to colonoscopy; conscious sedation and identify risk factors for complications in Malaysian adults. Consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy were enrolled prospectively. A combination of pethidine and midazolam were used and tolerance to colonoscopy assessed three hours post-procedure using a validated scale. All patients were monitored for cardiorespiratory depression and risk factors for complications were identified. Two hundred and eight patients (mean age 57.2 +/- 14.8 years, 48% female) were enrolled. The population ethnicity consisted of 45 (21.63%) Malays, 101 (48.56%) Chinese and 56 (26.92%) Indians. Conscious sedation was achieved with 5.0 +/- 1.1 mg of midazolam and 43.3 +/- 14.0 mg of pethidine. Thirty (14.4%) patients tolerated the procedure poorly and independent predictors included female gender (OR 2.93, 95% CI = 1.22 to 7.01) and a prolonged duration of procedure (OR 2.85, 95% CI = 1.08 to 7.48). Hypotension occurred in 13 (6.25%) patients, with age > 65 years as the only risk factor (OR 13.17, 95% CI = 1.28 to 137.92). A prolonged duration was the main cause of hypoxia (OR 5.49, 95% CI = 1.54 to 19.49), which occurred in 6 (2.88%) patients. No major complications occurred during the study period. The current practice of conscious sedation is safe and tolerated well by most adults in our population. However, poor tolerance in a notable minority may have significant clinical implications.

Study site: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC)

Matched MeSH terms: Conscious Sedation/adverse effects*
Sedation Intensity in the First 48 Hours of Mechanical Ventilation and 180-Day Mortality: A Multinational Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study

Shehabi Y, Bellomo R, Kadiman S, Ti LK, Howe B, Reade MC, et al.

Crit Care Med, 2018 06;46(6):850-859.
PMID: 29498938 DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003071

OBJECTIVES: In the absence of a universal definition of light or deep sedation, the level of sedation that conveys favorable outcomes is unknown. We quantified the relationship between escalating intensity of sedation in the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation and 180-day survival, time to extubation, and delirium.
DESIGN: Harmonized data from prospective multicenter international longitudinal cohort studies SETTING:: Diverse mix of ICUs.
PATIENTS: Critically ill patients expected to be ventilated for longer than 24 hours.
INTERVENTIONS: Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and pain were assessed every 4 hours. Delirium and mobilization were assessed daily using the Confusion Assessment Method of ICU and a standardized mobility assessment, respectively.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sedation intensity was assessed using a Sedation Index, calculated as the sum of negative Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale measurements divided by the total number of assessments. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to adjust for relevant covariates. We performed subgroup and sensitivity analysis accounting for immortal time bias using the same variables within 120 and 168 hours. The main outcome was 180-day survival. We assessed 703 patients in 42 ICUs with a mean (SD) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 22.2 (8.5) with 180-day mortality of 32.3% (227). The median (interquartile range) ventilation time was 4.54 days (2.47-8.43 d). Delirium occurred in 273 (38.8%) of patients. Sedation intensity, in an escalating dose-dependent relationship, independently predicted increased risk of death (hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.29 [1.15-1.46]; p < 0.001, delirium hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.25 [1.10-1.43]), p value equals to 0.001 and reduced chance of early extubation hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.80 (0.73-0.87), p value of less than 0.001. Agitation level independently predicted subsequent delirium hazard ratio [95% CI], of 1.25 (1.04-1.49), p value equals to 0.02. Delirium or mobilization episodes within 168 hours, adjusted for sedation intensity, were not associated with survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Sedation intensity independently, in an ascending relationship, predicted increased risk of death, delirium, and delayed time to extubation. These observations suggest that keeping sedation level equivalent to a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale 0 is a clinically desirable goal.

Matched MeSH terms: Conscious Sedation/adverse effects
Chronic Subdural Hematoma Drainage Under Local Anesthesia with Sedation versus General Anesthesia and Its Outcome

Wong HM, Woo XL, Goh CH, Chee PHC, Adenan AH, Tan PCS, et al.

World Neurosurg, 2022 01;157:e276-e285.
PMID: 34648987 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.074

BACKGROUND: Burr hole drainage is the criterion standard treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), a common neurosurgical condition. However, apart from the surgical technique, the method of anesthesia also has a significant impact on postoperative patient outcome. Currently, there are limited studies comparing the use of local anesthesia with sedation (LA sedation) versus general anesthesia (GA) in the drainage of CSDH. The objective of this study was to compare the morbidity and mortality outcomes of using LA sedation versus GA in CSDH burr hole drainage.
METHODS: This retrospective study presents a total of 257 operations in 243 patients from 2 hospitals. A total of 130 cases were operated under LA sedation in hospital 1 and 127 cases under GA in hospital 2. Patient demographics and presenting features were similar at baseline.
RESULTS: Values are shown as LA sedation versus GA. Postoperatively, most patients recovered well in both groups with Glasgow Outcome Scale scores of 4-5 (96.2% vs. 88.2%, respectively). The postoperative morbidity was significantly increased by an odds ratio of 5.44 in the GA group compared with the LA sedation group (P = 0.005). The mortality was also significantly higher in the GA group (n = 5, 3.9%) than the LA sedation group (n = 0, 0.0%; P = 0.028). The CSDH recurrence rate was 4.6% in the LA sedation group versus 6.3% in the GA group. No intraoperative conversion from LA sedation to GA was reported.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that CSDH drainage under LA sedation is safe and efficacious, with a significantly lower risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity when compared with GA.

Matched MeSH terms: Conscious Sedation/adverse effects