METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing registry data of LT recipients from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021. Outcomes analysis was performed using Cox proportional model for all-cause mortality and graft failure. Confounding was reduced by coarsened exact matching causal inference analysis.
RESULTS: Of 66 960 donors identified, 7178 (10.7%) had diabetes. Trend analysis revealed a longitudinal increase in the prevalence of donor diabetes ( P graft failure (HR: 1.16; 95% CI, 1.11-1.22; P graft survival in patients who received LT for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis (HR: 1.26; 95% CI, 1.13-1.41; P
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 140 patients who had compatible ABO blood type with negative T-cell lymphocytotoxicity crossmatch were included in the study and 25% of them were spousal transplant donors. No remarkable differences in acute rejection rate, graft survival, patient survival and serum creatinine level were observed between the spousal and living-related donor groups.
RESULTS: The spousal donor group had a higher degree of HLA mismatch than the living-related donor group. HLA-A mismatch was associated with increased rejection risk at 6 months (odds ratio [OR], 2.75; P = 0.04), 1 year (OR, 2.54; P = 0.03) and 3 years (OR, 3.69; P = 0.001). It was also observed in the deleterious effects of HLA-B and HLA-DQ loci when the number of antigen mismatches increased. The risk was 7 times higher in patients with ≥1 mismatch at HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR loci than those who did not have a mismatch at these loci at 6 months (P = 0.01), 1 year (P = 0.03) and 3 years (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: A good match for HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-DR and HLA-DQ can prevent acute rejection risk in renal transplant patients. Consequently, spousal donor transplants could be a safe intervention in renal patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of BK or Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) patients who underwent DSEK or PK from 2015 to 2019 in Kuala Lumpur Hospital with a minimal post-operative follow-up of 2 years. Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), graft survival and complications. A total of 26 DSEK cases and 32 PK cases were included.
RESULTS: At 2 years, graft survival rates were quite similar in two groups (DSEK 80.8% vs PK 75%, p=0.765). The mean follow-up period was 35.2 months in DSEK and 31.4 months for PK (p=0.465). The cumulative survival rates were slightly higher in the DSEK group (DSEK 73.1% vs PK 53.1%, p=0.119), but the result was not statistically significant. Postoperative complications were associated with higher graft failure in both groups (p=0.019). DSEK group has better post-operative BCVA (LogMAR DSEK 0.42 vs PK 0.83, p=0.003).
CONCLUSION: Similar graft survival rates were observed with both corneal transplant techniques for 2 years among Malaysian patients with BK. Post-operative complications can cause a higher risk of graft failure. DSEK produced better post-operative BCVA compared to PK.
METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective cohort study recruiting all kidney transplant recipients in South Australia from January 2010 till December 2018. Following that, the incidence of blood transfusion within one week post-operatively were traced (transfusion group). The outcomes were compared with all other transplant recipients (non-transfusion group). Recipient's demographic, donor characteristics and immunological risk profiles were obtained from the transplant unit database, while the biopsy report, history of blood transfusion, latest serum creatinine and follow-up status was gathered from the electronic medical system (OASIS). The HLA-DSA and HLA-Ab results were collected from the NOMS database. Finally, the survival data were merged with the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry for South Australia recipients graft survival.
RESULTS: A total of 699 patients were eligible for analysis. The mean age was 50.64 ± 13.23 years old. There were more elderly (>65 years old) and females who needed transfusion. The majority had glomerulonephritis as the primary disease. There was no statistical difference in donor characteristics, cold ischemic time and immunological risk between the transfusion and non-transfusion group. There was no difference in the development of de novo HLA-DSA, HLA-Ab and rejection episodes between the group and the results were consistent in a model adjusted for all potential confounders. Median graft survival in days between the transfusion vs non-transfusion group was 1845 IQR (961,2430) and 1250 IQR (672,2013).
CONCLUSION: Blood transfusion under strong immunosuppressive cover within a one-week post-operative period is safe with no significant association with the development of de novo HLA-DSA, HLA-Ab or clinical rejection.
METHODS: We conducted a case-control study comparing 25 patients with biopsy-proven LACR against 25 stable controls matched for age group, primary diagnosis and time post-transplant. IPV was calculated using coefficient of variance (CV) and mean absolute deviation (MAD) using tacrolimus levels in the preceding 12 months. We also assessed the percentage time for tacrolimus levels
METHODOLOGY: All sera for AT1R-Ab were collected at the University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The sera were centrifuged and kept refrigerated at -80 °C before being transported to the South Australian Transplantation and Immunogenetics Laboratory (SATIS). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (One Lambda) was used for the detection of AT1R-Ab, and it was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The level of >17.1 U/mL was considered to be AT1R-Ab positive; 10.0-17.1 U/mL at risk, and <10.0 U/mL negative.
RESULTS: A total of 115 samples were collected from 99 patients pre and post-kidney transplant recipients. From the pre-transplant sera (n = 68) 17.7% were positive, 35.3% were at risk and 47.0% were negative. The positive AT1R-Ab cohort were relatively younger, with a mean age of 34.7 ± 8.3 years old and statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.028. Among the sera that were tested positive, 19.0% were from the Chinese ethnicity, 6.7% from Malay and 16.7% from Indian. There was no difference in the rejection episodes, persistent or de novo HLA-DSA, and graft function between the group (AT1R-Ab negative vs AT1R-Ab at risk and positive) and the results were consistent in a model adjusted for all potential confounders.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of positive (>17.1 U/mL) pre-transplant AT1R-Ab was 17.7% and 35.3% were at risk (10.0-17.1 U/mL) in our pre-transplant cohort.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial to assess the efficacy of autologous blood in place of fibrin glue in pterygium surgery. A total of 120 eyes of 111 patients were randomized according to pterygium morphology, to undergo pterygium surgery with autografting using either autologous blood or fibrin glue. All patients were operated by a single surgeon; 58 eyes were operated using fibrin glue and 62 eyes had a conjunctival autograft with autologous blood. Patients were seen on postoperative day 1, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Graft stability and pterygium recurrence were graded by an independent observer who was masked to the method of treatment.
RESULTS: All 120 eyes completed the 1-year follow-up. Graft loss was seen only in the autologous blood group. Of the 62 eyes in this group, a total of 15 (24.2%) grafts dislodged. Recurrence was calculated after excluding grafts that were dislodged. Of the 105 patients, there were a total of 7 recurrences, 2 (3.4%) from the fibrin adhesive method and 5 (10.6%) from the autologous blood method. This was not statistically significant (P = 0.238).
CONCLUSIONS: Autologous blood does not exhibit similar graft stability seen with fibrin glue. Although the recurrence rate may not be significant, careful patient selection and a standard method needs to be laid out before the use of this method is widely accepted.