Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Stoppe C, Lee ZY, Ortiz L, Heyland DK, Patel JJ
    PMID: 35088422 DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2338
    Vitamin C is an essential micronutrient with antioxidant properties and its use in critical illness has gained interest in recent years.1 Four systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRMAs) have been published in 2021 alone (see Table 1 summary).2-5 These 4 SRMAs included between 8-43 randomized controlled trials evaluating vitamin C with or without thiamine and/or corticosteroids in general ICU patients and those with sepsis and septic shock. 2-5 Fujii et al performed a network meta-analysis which is a method for comparing multiple treatments using both direct and indirect evidence across trials that included studies with vitamin C monotherapy or with thiamine and/or corticosteroids.9 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
  2. Bäck M, Topouchian J, Labat C, Gautier S, Blacher J, Cwynar M, et al.
    EBioMedicine, 2024 May;103:105107.
    PMID: 38632024 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105107
    BACKGROUND: The cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) measure of arterial stiffness is associated with prevalent cardiovascular risk factors, while its predictive value for cardiovascular events remains to be established. The aim was to determine associations of CAVI with cardiovascular morbimortality (primary outcome) and all-cause mortality (secondary outcome), and to establish the determinants of CAVI progression.

    METHODS: TRIPLE-A-Stiffness, an international multicentre prospective longitudinal study, enrolled >2000 subjects ≥40 years old at 32 centres from 18 European countries. Of these, 1250 subjects (55% women) were followed for a median of 3.82 (2.81-4.69) years.

    FINDINGS: Unadjusted cumulative incidence rates of outcomes according to CAVI stratification were higher in highest stratum (CAVI > 9). Cox regression with adjustment for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors revealed that CAVI was associated with increased cardiovascular morbimortality (HR 1.25 per 1 increase; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.03-1.51) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.37 per 1 increase; 95% CI: 1.10-1.70) risk in subjects ≥60 years. In ROC analyses, CAVI optimal threshold was 9.25 (c-index 0.598; 0.542-0.654) and 8.30 (c-index 0.565; 0.512-0.618) in subjects ≥ or <60 years, respectively, to predict increased CV morbimortality. Finally, age, mean arterial blood pressure, anti-diabetic and lipid-lowering treatment were independent predictors of yearly CAVI progression adjusted for baseline CAVI.

    INTERPRETATION: The present study identified additional value for CAVI to predict outcomes after adjustment for CV risk factors, in particular for subjects ≥60 years. CAVI progression may represent a modifiable risk factor by treatments.

    FUNDING: International Society of Vascular Health (ISVH) and Fukuda Denshi, Japan.

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links