Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Pharmaceutical Life Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [email protected]
  • 2 Regenerative Medicine Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Bertam, 13200, Kepala Batas, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • 3 Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 4 Infectious Diseases Research Group, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
  • 5 Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bioscience and Nursing, MAHSA University, 42610, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 6 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UCSI University, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 7 Department of Pharmaceutical Life Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 8 Department of Pathobiology and Medical Diagnostic, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. [email protected]
BMC Infect Dis, 2021 Aug 31;21(1):893.
PMID: 34465288 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06606-6

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported a significant association of knowledge, attitude and preventive practice (KAP) regarding dengue infection among community's resident in endemic areas. In this study we aimed to assess and develop a reliable and valid KAP survey on the subject of dengue that is suitable for the resident population of Sabah, Malaysia.

METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2019 to February 2020 involving 468 respondents. Information on the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants (six items), their KAP (44, 15 and 18 items on knowledge, attitude and practice, respectively) and treatment-seeking behaviour (five items) towards dengue was collected using a structured questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using SPSS and R software in the R Studio environment. The knowledge section was analysed by two-parameter logistic item response theory (2-PL IRT) using ltm package. The construct validity and reliability of items for sections on attitude, practice and treatment-seeking behaviour were analysed using psy package.

RESULTS: For the knowledge section, only 70.5% (31/44) of items were within or close to the parameter acceptable range of -3 to + 3 of difficulty. In terms of discrimination, 65.9% (29/44) of items were within or close to the acceptable range of 0.35 to 2.5, and 24 items (54.5%) failed to fit the 2-PL IRT model (P  0.7, while based on the communalities, 11 items in the attitude section were excluded due to very low h2, factor loading values and low correlation with the total ( 0.7. The communalities of the practice section showed that seven items had low h2 values (

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.