Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia
  • 2 Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 422, Alkharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia. [email protected]
  • 3 King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 4 Nuclear Medicine Department, INAYA Medical Collage, Riyadh, 13541, Saudi Arabia
  • 5 Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 10219, Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia
  • 6 Radiological Sciences Program, College of Applied Medical Sciences (COMAS), King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-US), King Abdul Aziz Medical City (KAMC), King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre (KAIMRC), National Guard Health Affairs (NGHA), Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • 7 Department of Medical Physics, Medical School, University of Thessaly, 41110, Larissa, Greece
  • 8 Department of Physics, Centre for Nuclear and Radiation Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, Surrey, UK
Sci Rep, 2021 Jul 15;11(1):14557.
PMID: 34267237 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93342-1

Abstract

Worldwide, thyroid cancer accounts for some 10% of total cancer incidence, most markedly for females. Thyroid cancer radiotherapy, typically using 131I (T1/2 8.02 days; β- max energy 606 keV, branching ratio 89.9%), is widely adopted as an adjunct to surgery or to treat inoperable cancer and hyperthyroidism. With staff potentially receiving significant doses during source preparation and administration, radiation protection and safety assessment are required in ensuring practice complies with international guidelines. The present study, concerning a total of 206 patient radioiodine therapies carried out at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center over a 6-month period, seeks to evaluate patient and occupational exposures during hospitalization, measuring ambient doses and estimating radiation risk. Using calibrated survey meters, patient exposure dose-rate estimates were obtained at a distance of 30-, 100- and 300 cm from the neck region of each patient. Occupational and ambient doses were measured using calibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters. The mean and range of administered activity (AA, in MBq) for the thyroid cancer and hyperthyroidism treatment groups were 4244 ± 2021 (1669-8066), 1507.9 ± 324.1 (977.9-1836.9), respectively. The mean annual occupational doses were 1.2 mSv, that for ambient doses outside of the isolation room corridors were found to be 0.2 mSv, while ambient doses at the nursing station were below the lower limit of detection. Exposures to staff from patients being treated for thyroid cancer were less compared to hyperthyroidism patients. With a well-defined protocol, also complying with international safety requirements, occupational exposures were found to be relatively high, greater than most reported in previous studies.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.