Affiliations 

  • 1 Collaborative Drug Discovery Research (CDDR) Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University (Parkville Campus), Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • 2 Lung Transplant Service, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • 3 Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • 4 Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University (Parkville Campus), Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • 5 Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University (Parkville Campus), Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: [email protected]
Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2014 Sep;44(3):194-202.
PMID: 25123811 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.05.013

Abstract

Lung transplant (LTx) patients have an increased risk of developing invasive fungal infections (IFIs), particularly invasive aspergillosis. Rapid identification of the causative fungal pathogen, to allow for early administration of appropriate initial antifungal therapy, in LTx patients has been challenging due to the limited sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic tools. Hence, there is increasing emphasis on antifungal prophylaxis in the LTx setting, given the high mortality rates and substantial cost of treating IFIs. Evidence for the optimal antifungal prophylactic approach in this setting, however, remains scant and inconsistent. This review will briefly discuss the epidemiology, risk factors, timing and clinical manifestations of fungal infections in LTx patients and will focus primarily on the available evidence related to the efficacy, safety and practicality of current prophylactic strategies in LTx recipients as well as challenges and gaps for future research.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.