Affiliations 

  • 1 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Jalan Raja Perempuan Zainab 2, Kota Bharu, Kelantan 16150, Malaysia. [email protected]
  • 2 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Jalan Raja Perempuan Zainab 2, Kota Bharu, Kelantan 16150, Malaysia
Med J Malaysia, 2014 Apr;69(2):74-8.
PMID: 25241816 MyJurnal

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss and post operative pain between coblation tonsillectomy and cold tonsillectomy in the same patient. A prospective single blind control trial was carried out on 34 patients whom underwent tonsillectomy. The patients with known bleeding disorder, history of unilateral peritonsillar abscess and unilateral tonsillar hypertrophy were excluded. Operations were done by a single surgeon using cold dissection tonsillectomy in one side while coblation tonsillectomy in the other. Intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss and post operative pain during the first 3 days were compared between the two methods. Results showed that the intraoperative time was significantly shorter (p<0.001) and intraoperative blood loss was significantly lesser (p<0.001) in coblation tonsillectomy as compared to cold tonsillectomy. Post operative pain score was significantly less at 6 hours post operation (p<0.001) in coblation tonsillectomy as compared to cold tonsillectomy. However, there were no differences in the post operative pain scores on day 1, 2 and 3. In conclusion, coblation tonsillectomy does have superiority in improving intraoperative efficiency in term of intraoperative time and bleeding compared to cold dissection tonsillectomy. The patient will benefit with minimal post operative pain in the immediate post surgery duration.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.