Affiliations 

  • 1 Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Old Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK. [email protected]
  • 2 Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
  • 3 General Practitioners Research Institute, 59713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • 4 Department of Family Medicine, 6-10 University Terrace, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2T4, Canada
  • 5 Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 6 Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
  • 7 Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de las Islas Baleares (IdISBa), Palma, Spain
  • 8 Department of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
  • 9 Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Unit at Red Cross Maingau Hospital, Friedberger Anlage 31-32, 60316, Frankfurt, Germany
  • 10 NHS Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group, Brockworth, UK
  • 11 Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 12 Global Respiratory Franchise, GlaxoSmithKline plc., GSK House, 980 Great West Rd, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GS, UK
  • 13 Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med, 2020 06 17;30(1):29.
PMID: 32555169 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-020-0184-0

Abstract

Asthma imposes a substantial burden on individuals and societies. Patients with asthma need high-quality primary care management; however, evidence suggests the quality of this care can be highly variable. Here we identify and report factors contributing to high-quality management. Twelve primary care global asthma experts, representing nine countries, identified key factors. A literature review (past 10 years) was performed to validate or refute the expert viewpoint. Key driving factors identified were: policy, clinical guidelines, rewards for performance, practice organisation and workforce. Further analysis established the relevant factor components. Review evidence supported the validity of each driver; however, impact on patient outcomes was uncertain. Single interventions (e.g. healthcare practitioner education) showed little effect; interventions driven by national policy (e.g. incentive schemes and teamworking) were more effective. The panel's opinion, supported by literature review, concluded that multiple primary care interventions offer greater benefit than any single intervention in asthma management.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.