Affiliations 

  • 1 Children's Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Subspecialties, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore. [email protected]
  • 2 Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, NUS Graduate School for Integrative Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, Singapore, 117549, Singapore
  • 3 Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 136 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Yuzhong district, Chongqing, 400041, China
  • 4 Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
  • 5 National Children's Hospital, 18/879 La Thành, Láng Thượng, Đống Đa, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 6 Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
  • 7 Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, 56 Nanlishi Rd, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100045, China
  • 8 Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
  • 9 Department of Pediatrics, University of Malaya. Jalan Universiti, 50603, Wilayah Persekutuan, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 10 Sarawak General Hospital, Jalan Hospital, 93586, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • 11 Critical Care Excellence Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
  • 12 Children's Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Subspecialties, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore
Crit Care, 2020 01 31;24(1):31.
PMID: 32005285 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2741-x

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) use was associated with greater mortality in adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Nevertheless, HFOV is still frequently used as rescue therapy in paediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). In view of the limited evidence for HFOV in PARDS and evidence demonstrating harm in adult patients with ARDS, we hypothesized that HFOV use compared to other modes of mechanical ventilation is associated with increased mortality in PARDS.

METHODS: Patients with PARDS from 10 paediatric intensive care units across Asia from 2009 to 2015 were identified. Data on epidemiology and clinical outcomes were collected. Patients on HFOV were compared to patients on other modes of ventilation. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality and secondary outcomes were 28-day ventilator- (VFD) and intensive care unit- (IFD) free days. Genetic matching (GM) method was used to analyse the association between HFOV treatment with the primary outcome. Additionally, we performed a sensitivity analysis, including propensity score (PS) matching, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and marginal structural modelling (MSM) to estimate the treatment effect.

RESULTS: A total of 328 patients were included. In the first 7 days of PARDS, 122/328 (37.2%) patients were supported with HFOV. There were significant differences in baseline oxygenation index (OI) between the HFOV and non-HFOV groups (18.8 [12.0, 30.2] vs. 7.7 [5.1, 13.1] respectively; p 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.