Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Industrial Technology, Environmental Technology Division, University Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia. [email protected]
  • 2 School of Industrial Technology, Environmental Technology Division, University Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Biological Engineering & Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology IIT, Delhi, 110016, India. [email protected]
  • 4 UTM Palm Oil Research Center, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 54100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 5 Ecoscience Research Foundation, Chennai, 600014, India
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2017 May;24(14):12982-12990.
PMID: 28378309 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8938-0

Abstract

The present paper reports management of palm oil mill effluent (POME) mixed with palm-pressed fibre (PPF) POME-PPF mixture using eco-friendly, cost-effective vermicomposting technology. Vermicomposting of POME-PPF was performed to examine the optimal POME-PPF ratio with respect to the criteria of earthworm biomass and to evaluate the decomposition of carbon and nitrogen in different percentages of POME-PPF mixtures. Chemical parameters such as TOC, N, P and K contents were determined to achieve optimal decomposition of POME-PPF. On this basis, the obtained data of 50% POME-PPF mixture demonstrated more significant results throughout the experiment after addition of the earthworms. However, 60 and 70% mixtures found significant only in the last stages of the vermicomposting process. The decomposition rate in terms of -ln (CNt/CNo) showed that the 50% mixture has higher decomposition rate as compared to the 60 and 70% (k50% = 0.0498 day(-1)). The vermicomposting extracts (50, 60 and 70%) of POME-PPF mixtures were also tested to examine the growth of mung bean (Vigna radiata). It was found that among different extract dilutions, 50% POME-PPF vermicompost extract provided longer root and shoot length of mung bean. The present study concluded that the 50% mixture of POME-PPF could be chosen as the optimal mixture for vermicomposting in terms of both decomposition rate and fertilizer value of the final compost. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.