Affiliations 

  • 1 Vijayan Valayatham, MD MRCOG. Sabah Women & Children Hospital (Likas), PO Box 187, 88996, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. [email protected]
  • 2 Raman Subramaniam, MD FROCP FRCP. FMGC, Petaling Jaya, Selangor.
  • 3 Yap Moy Juan, MBBS MRCOG. FMGC, Petaling Jaya, Selangor.
  • 4 Patrick Chia, FAFPM, FRCOG. FMGC, Petaling Jaya, Selangor.
Med J Malaysia, 2013 Aug;68(4):297-300.
PMID: 24145255 MyJurnal

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Analyze indications and type of prenatal diagnostic procedures performed.
METHOD: This retrospective audit was conducted at a dedicated fetal medicine center in Petaling Jaya. All invasive prenatal diagnosis procedures performed from 2003 up until 2010 (amniocentesis, chorionic villous sampling and fetal blood sampling) were analyzed.
RESULT: A total of 1560 invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures were performed during the 8 year period. Advanced maternal age is the leading indication for invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures followed by fetal abnormalities. The fetal loss rate was 0.2% for amniocentesis and 1.2% for CVS.
CONCLUSION: Advanced maternal age is the leading indication for invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures at this centre but is on a declining trend. The fetal loss rates are comparable to auditable standards set by professional bodies, in this case, the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists of London.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.