Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Center, Lister Hospital, Stevenage. Electronic address: [email protected]
  • 2 Department of Urology, UPM, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 4 Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Center, Lister Hospital, Stevenage
  • 5 Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
  • 6 Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Center, Lister Hospital, Stevenage; School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
Urol Oncol, 2024 Dec;42(12):421-428.
PMID: 39299895 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.08.019

Abstract

Conventionally, transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) was the main technique used for the diagnosis of prostate cancer since it was first described in 1989 [1]. However, the PROMIS trial showed that this random, nontargeted approach could miss up to 18% of clinically significant cancer (csPCa) [2]. Furthermore, risk of sepsis post TRUS-Bx can be as high as 2.4% [3]. Understanding the demerits of TR-biopsy have led to the introduction of transperineal prostate biopsy (TP-Bx). The incorporation of mpMRI revolutionized prostate cancer diagnostics, allowing visualization of areas likely to harbor csPCa whilst permitting some men to avoid an immediate biopsy. Furthermore, the advent of prostate specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is highly promising, because of its role in primary diagnosis of prostate cancer and its higher diagnostic accuracy over conventional imaging in detecting nodal and metastatic lesions. Our narrative review provides an overview on prostate biopsy techniques and an update on prostate imaging, with particular focus on PSMA-PET.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications