Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Postgraduate and Professional Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia;, Email: [email protected]
  • 2 Department of International Business & Management Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Cawangan Selangor,42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  • 3 General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia 750004, China;, Email: [email protected]
Am J Health Behav, 2023 Feb 28;47(1):165-172.
PMID: 36945091 DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.47.1.17

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we analyzed negative online public opinion in tertiary hospitals and evaluated corresponding risk by applying the Kaiser Model. Methods: Through data and expert group discussion, combined with the hospital's actual negative online public opinion management, we determined the opinions posing higher risk. The hospital's risk questionnaire for negative opinion was designed based on the Kaiser Model. The whole hospital staff was then trained and investigated. An Excel worksheet was used for statistical analysis and risk calculation.Results: According to the ranking of risk value, the top 5 negative online public opinions were drug supply and demand, in-hospital parking, handling of public health emergencies, the service attitude of hospital guidance staff, and interpretation of medical insurance policies. Conclusion: The hospital needs to revise and improve the emergency response plan for negative online public opinion based on the analysis results and reports of opinion risks. This is helpful for strengthening hospital-level emergency training, improving the hospital's ability to manage negative opinion risks, and promoting the hospital to become passive about negative online public opinion.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.