BACKGROUND: Identification and management of malnutrition among pediatric hospitalized patients is critical for improved clinical outcomes and recovery. This study investigated the use of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (AND/ASPEN) pediatric malnutrition diagnosis in comparison with the Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (SGNA) tool and single anthropometric indicators (weight, height, body mass index, and mid-upper arm circumference) among hospitalized children.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 260 children admitted to general medical wards. SGNA and anthropometric measurements were used as references. Kappa agreement, diagnostic values, and area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of the AND/ASPEN malnutrition diagnosis tool. Logistic binary regression was performed to determine the predictive ability of each malnutrition diagnosis tool on the length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: The AND/ASPEN diagnosis tool detected the highest malnutrition rate (41%) among the hospitalized children in comparison with the reference methods. This tool demonstrated fair specificity of 74% and sensitivity of 70% compared with the SGNA. It obtained a weak agreement in determining the presence of malnutrition by kappa (0.06-0.42) and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (AUC = 0.54-0.72). The use of the AND/ASPEN tool obtained an odds ratio of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.44-1.61; P = 0.59) in predicting the length of hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: The AND/ASPEN malnutrition tool is an acceptable nutrition assessment tool for hospitalized children in general medical wards.
* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.