Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Sports Science, Nantong University, Nantong, China
  • 2 Exercise & Sports Science Programme, School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
  • 3 National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia; Research Group Human Movement, Universitat de Lleida, Lleida, Spain
  • 4 Center for Health and Exercise Science Research; Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
  • 5 Defence Fitness Academy, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 6 Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
PeerJ, 2023;11:e14508.
PMID: 36647447 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14508

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) with different recovery modes versus moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) on cardiac troponin (cTn) elevation.

METHODOLOGY: A literature search was conducted in four databases: Scopus, PubMed, EBSCO and Web of Science from January 2010 to June 2022. The articles were screened, evaluated for quality before data were extracted. The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021245649). Standardized mean differences (SMD) of peak cTn were analyzed with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using Revman 5.4 software.

RESULTS: Six studies satisfied the inclusion criteria with a total of 92 and 79 participants for HIIE and MICE, respectively. Overall, there was no significant difference between HIIE and MICE in the elevation of cardiac troponin T (SMD: 0.41 [95% CI [-0.21, 1.03]], p = 0.20, I 2 = 77%, p for heterogeneity <0.01). In subgroup analysis, HIIE with passive recovery elicits greater release of cardiac troponin T than MICE (SMD: 0.85 [95% CI [0.44, 1.27]], p 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.