Displaying all 8 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Mahamooth Z
    Med J Malaysia, 1987 Sep;42(3):191-5.
    PMID: 3506643
    Retrograde ureteroscopy, using the 12.5 French Storsz Perez-Castro Ellendt operating ureteroscope provides excellent visual access to the whole of the ureteric lumen in most instances. A total of 41 ureteroscopies were performed on a similar number of patients over a period of 12 months since April 1986. Majority of them were for ureteric calculi. Success rate for patients with ureteric calculi below the pelvic brim was 77.4%. A lower success was noted for calculi above the pelvic brim (50%). Retrograde ureteroscopy will eventually make blind basketing of lower ureteric stones an unnecessarily risky procedure and perhaps even obsolete. Ureterolithotomy nevertheless will still have a place in the management of stones that cannot be extracted either due to acute bullous oedema of the ureteric mucosa or in previously explored rigid non-yielding ureters not suitable for ureteroscopy.
    Matched MeSH terms: Ureteral Calculi/therapy*
  2. Tan HM, Cheung HS
    Med J Malaysia, 1990 Jun;45(2):113-7.
    PMID: 2152014
    Three hundred and ninety five cases in 358 consecutive patients (male-232, female-126) with renal and ureteric stones were treated with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) from March to November 1988. They either had ESWL alone, or in combination with stone manipulation or debulking percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). Seventy five percent of the stones were found in the pelvicalyceal system and 25% in the ureter. Seventy-six percent of the stones were less than 25mm size. Two hundred and ninety (79%) cases were followed up to three months. Two hundred and forty nine (85.9%) cases were stone free and 36 (12.4%) had residual sand less than 3mm size. Five (1.7%) cases failed to fragment with ESWL monotherapy and were salvaged by either percutaneous or ureteroscopic intervention. None of the cases required any open surgery intervention.
    Matched MeSH terms: Ureteral Calculi/therapy*
  3. Kamarulzaman MN
    Urol J, 2014 Nov 01;11(5):1914.
    PMID: 25361715
    Matched MeSH terms: Ureteral Calculi/therapy*
  4. Tan HM, Liew RP, Chan CC, Wong AT, Ngun KW
    Med J Malaysia, 1995 Mar;50(1):87-92.
    PMID: 7752983
    One thousand one hundred and sixty three patients (male-852, female-311) with ureteric calculi requiring intervention were treated between April 1988 to July 1992. Four hundred and eleven cases were treated by ESWL Monotherapy, 414 by stone manipulation plus ESWL, 301 by retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 36 by percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopic lithotripsy and 1 case by open ureterolithotomy. There were 25 failures of the initial procedures. Only three cases that failed primary procedures required open surgery. Other complications include minor ureteric mucosal perforation (3%), infection (3%), transient moderate to gross haematuria (20%), loin ache (26.4%), irritative urination (34.4%) and low grade fever (30.1%). Current modalities used in the treatment of ureteric calculi produce good results and there is generally no primary role for any open surgery.
    Matched MeSH terms: Ureteral Calculi/therapy*
  5. Tan HM, Cheung HS
    Med J Malaysia, 1990 Jun;45(2):118-22.
    PMID: 2152015
    Sixty eight consecutive cases of percutaneous renal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL), were performed on 64 patients (male-41, female-23) at the Subang Jaya Medical Centre from April 1988 to July 1989. All the cases were done as a one stage procedure. Fifty eight stones were large renal or staghorn and ten were ureteric. Thirty cases (41%) were stone free after PCNL alone. Thirty eight cases had residual fragments needing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). Mean operating time was 109.6 +/- 36.0 minutes. Mean hospital stay was 4.5 +/- 1.8 days. At three months follow-up, 86% of the cases were stone free. The remaining had residual sand (less than 3mm). Minor complications occurred in six patients. None required major surgical intervention post PCNL.
    Matched MeSH terms: Ureteral Calculi/therapy
  6. Fam XI, Singam P, Ho CC, Sridharan R, Hod R, Bahadzor B, et al.
    Korean J Urol, 2015 Jan;56(1):63-7.
    PMID: 25598938 DOI: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.63
    Urinary calculi is a familiar disease. A well-known complication of endourological treatment for impacted ureteral stones is the formation of ureteral strictures, which has been reported to occur in 14.2% to 24% of cases.
    Matched MeSH terms: Ureteral Calculi/therapy*
  7. Izamin I, Aniza I, Rizal AM, Aljunid SM
    Med J Malaysia, 2009 Mar;64(1):12-21.
    PMID: 19852314
    Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) are two main methods of treating proximal ureteric stones. Success rates and cost-effectiveness of the two methods were compared. A total of 67 patients who underwent treatment between January 2007 and July 2007 at a state general hospital were included in the study. The success rate for ESWL group was 81.8% and for URS group was 84.6%. ESWL technique produced a significant higher overall cost per patient than URS (RM930.02 versus RM621.95 respectively). There was no significant difference in quality of patient's life. Cost-effectiveness ratio was lower for URS. The analysis suggested that URS was more cost-effective than ESWL.
    Matched MeSH terms: Ureteral Calculi/therapy*
  8. Hussein NS, Gohar MR
    Singapore Med J, 2011 Jan;52(1):42-6.
    PMID: 21298240
    Two to three percent of stone disease cases occur in the paediatric age group. It is common in some parts of the world, such as in Turkey, India and Thailand. More than 50 percent of stones in children are still managed through open surgery. Ureteroscopic intervention for children remains a challenging treatment option. However, in contemporary urology practice, this mode of intervention is becoming more common. In this retrospective study, we reviewed our experiences with ureteroscopy and pneumatic lithotripsy in the paediatric and adolescent age group.
    Matched MeSH terms: Ureteral Calculi/therapy
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links