Displaying all 6 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Liew NC, Lee L
    World J Surg, 2016 07;40(7):1788-9.
    PMID: 26464151 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3273-4
    Matched MeSH terms: Thromboembolism/drug therapy; Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy*
  2. Ahmat ANMF, Wan Puteh SE, Yusak S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2021 Nov 01;22(11):3601-3606.
    PMID: 34837918 DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.11.3601
    OBJECTIVE: Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) is a common disease or complication which is associated with reduced survival and incurring a substantial health-care cost. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) remained the gold standard treatment option available. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have recently become more popular in the guidelines, they are still few and inconsistent across the current literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate rivaroxaban in treatment of CAT.

    METHODS: In this prospective real-world study, we recruited and followed up patients diagnosed with CAT treated with rivaroxaban or standard of care as a control for 12 months or until death. Baseline characteristics were collected at the study entry. The primary outcomes were recurrent DVT or PE and death within 12 months after treatment initiation. Safety outcomes were composite outcomes of major and minor bleeding.    Results: A total of 80 patients confirm CAT with radiological imaging were recruited; 39 patients were evaluated in the control arm and 41 patients in the rivaroxaban arm. The 12 months cumulative CAT recurrence rate was 46.2% in control and 39% in rivaroxaban (p=0.519). The 12-month death was not a statistically significant difference between both arms (20.5% vs. 31.7%, p=0.255). The cumulative rate of composite safety outcomes was similar in both groups (17.9% vs. 12.2%, p=0.471).

    CONCLUSION: The result of this small but important real-world evidence proofs that rivaroxaban is an effective and safe alternative to the standard of care for CAT in Malaysia's cancer population.

    Matched MeSH terms: Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy*
  3. Vinazzer H
    Wien Z Inn Med, 1971;52(8):378-92.
    PMID: 5110844
    Matched MeSH terms: Thromboembolism/drug therapy*
  4. Vinazzer H
    Subsid Med, 1974;4:53-5.
    PMID: 4450561
    Matched MeSH terms: Thromboembolism/drug therapy
  5. Hasan SS, Kow CS, Curley LE, Baines DL, Babar ZU
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 2018 08;18(4):371-377.
    PMID: 29741099 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1474101
    INTRODUCTION: Anticoagulants refer to a variety of agents that inhibit one or more steps in the coagulation cascade. Generally, clinical conditions that require the prescribing of an oral anticoagulant increase in frequency with age. However, a major challenge of anticoagulation use among older patients is that this group of patients also experience the highest bleeding risk. To date, economic evaluation of prescribing of anticoagulants that includes the novel or newer oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in older adults has not been conducted and is warranted.

    AREAS COVERED: A review of articles that evaluated the cost of prescribing conventional (e.g. vitamin K antagonists) and NOACs (e.g. direct thrombin inhibitors and direct factor Xa inhibitors) in older adults.

    EXPERT COMMENTARY: While the use of NOACs significantly increases the cost of the initial treatment for thromboembolic disorders, they are still considered cost-effective relative to warfarin since they offer reduced risk of intracranial haemorrhagic events. The optimum anticoagulation with warfarin can be achieved by providing specialised care; clinics managed by pharmacists have been shown to be cost-effective relative to usual care. There are suggestions that genotyping the CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genes is useful for determining a more appropriate initial dose and thereby increasing the effectiveness and safety of warfarin.

    Matched MeSH terms: Thromboembolism/drug therapy
  6. Goldhaber SZ, Ageno W, Casella IB, Chee KH, Schellong S, Singer DE, et al.
    Am J Med, 2020 08;133(8):936-945.
    PMID: 32325043 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.03.036
    BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been established in randomized controlled trials, but limited data are available on their use in clinical practice across geographical regions.

    METHODS: In the international RE-COVERY DVT/PE observational study (enrollment January 2016 to May 2017), we sought to characterize the patient population and describe the prescribed anticoagulant. Patient characteristics and anticoagulants administered after objective diagnosis of VTE were recorded at the baseline visit and again at hospital discharge or at 14 days after the diagnosis, whichever was later.

    RESULTS: A total of 6095 patients were included, 50.2% were male, and the mean age was 61.5 years. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (35%), diabetes mellitus (11%), cancer (11%), prior VTE(11%), and trauma/surgery (7%). Overall, 77% of patients received oral anticoagulants, with 54% on NOACs and 23% on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs); 20% received parenteral anticoagulation only. NOACs comprised about 60% of anticoagulant treatment in Europe and Asia but substantially less in Latin America (29%) and the Middle East (21%). For NOAC therapies, the distribution (as a percentage of the total cohort) was rivaroxaban 25.6%, dabigatran 15.5%, apixaban 11.3%, and edoxaban 1.7%. Treatment with NOACs was less frequent in patients who had cancer, chronic renal disease, heart failure, or stroke.

    CONCLUSIONS: These findings enhance our understanding of baseline characteristics and the initial management of patients with VTE in routine practice.

    Matched MeSH terms: Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy*
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links