Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Tang KL, Wimmer BC, Akkawi ME, Ming LC, Ibrahim B
    Res Social Adm Pharm, 2018 Mar;14(3):317-319.
    PMID: 28365153 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.03.053
    Matched MeSH terms: Hospital Departments/statistics & numerical data
  2. Lau SC, Azim E, Abdul Latiff Z, Syed Zakaria SZ, Wong SW, Wu LL, et al.
    Med J Malaysia, 2018 12;73(6):382-387.
    PMID: 30647208
    INTRODUCTION: A smooth transition of healthcare for young people with chronic illnesses from paediatric to adult healthcare services is important to ensure optimal outcome. At the moment, there are no standard guidelines to assess a patient's readiness to transfer care.

    METHODS: A cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire, adapted from UNC (University of North Carolina) TRxANSITION self-assessment tool was conducted to evaluate patients' transition care readiness in paediatric haematology and paediatric diabetes clinic.

    RESULTS: A total of 80 patients (37 thalassaemia and 43 diabetes) with the mean age of 21.2 (SD±4.3) years, were recruited during the 3-month study period. Majority of the patients have basic knowledge regarding their medications, and were able to comply with their follow-up. The mean total score obtained by the respondents on this questionnaire was 15.3 (SD±3.59). Self-management skills and knowledge on disease were the two poorly scored section; with mean score of 3.78 (SD±1.38) and 4.28 (SD±1.20) respectively. Overall, only 21 (26.2%) respondents obtained high score (score above 75th percentile). Seventy-five percent of the respondents admitted that they were not ready for transfer to an adult healthcare service yet at the time of the study.

    CONCLUSION: We suggest that patients with high score should be prepared for transition to adult facility whereas those with a low score need to be identified to ensure provision of continuous education.
    Matched MeSH terms: Hospital Departments/statistics & numerical data*
  3. Vaani VV, Tang MM, Tan LL, Asmah J
    Med J Malaysia, 2018 06;73(3):125-130.
    PMID: 29962494 MyJurnal
    INTRODUCTION: Ultraviolet phototherapies are important treatment modalities for a wide range of dermatological conditions. We aim to describe the utilization of phototherapy in the Department of Dermatology Hospital Kuala Lumpur.

    METHODS: This is a 5-year retrospective audit on patients who underwent phototherapy between 2011 and 2015.

    RESULTS: There were 892 patients, M:F=1.08:1, aged from 4- 88 years, with a median age of 38.8 years who underwent phototherapy. Majority (58.9%) had skin phototype IV, followed by type III (37.7%) and type II (0.7%). There were 697(78.1%) who underwent NBUVB, 136 (15.2%) had topical PUVA, 22(2.5%) had oral PUVA, 12(1.4%) had UVA1 and 23(2.6%) had NBUVB with topical or oral PUVA/UVA1 at different time periods. The indications were psoriasis (46.6%), vitiligo (26.7%), atopic eczema (9.8%), pityriasis lichenoides chronica (5.3%), mycosis fungoides (3.9%), lichen planus (2.5%), nodular prurigo (2.2%), scleroderma (1.2%), alopecia areata (0.7%) and others. The median number of session received were 27 (range 1-252) for NBUVB, 30 (range 1-330) for topical PUVA, 30 (range 3-190) for oral PUVA and 24.5 (range 2-161) for UVA1. The acute adverse effects experienced by patients were erythema (18%), pruritus (16.3%), warmth (3.3%), blister formation (3.1%), cutaneous pain (2.4%), and xerosis (0.8%), skin swelling (0.7%) and phototoxicity (0.2%).

    CONCLUSION: Narrow-band UVB was the most frequently prescribed phototherapy modality in our center. The most common indication for phototherapy in our setting was psoriasis. Acute adverse events occurred in a third of patients, although these side effects were mild.

    Matched MeSH terms: Hospital Departments/statistics & numerical data*
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links