MyMedR

Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Fulltext Management of variceal haemorrhage

Merican MI

Med J Malaysia, 1992 Dec;47(4):238-47.
PMID: 1363889

Variceal bleeding is the most important complication of portal hypertension. Mortality due to the first variceal bleeding is very high (50%) and of those surviving a variceal bleeding episode, up to 80% may rebleed. Proper management of the acute variceal bleeding episode, the prevention of rebleeding and primary prophylaxis for variceal haemorrhage are therefore mandatory in order to improve the morbidity and mortality of cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding. Injection sclerotherapy would be the treatment of choice for acute variceal bleeding. Drug treatment in the form of either a combined vasopressinnitroglycerin regimen or somatostatin may be used as an alternative. Patients not responding to these treatments should be referred for surgery. For the prevention of variceal rebleeding, non-selective betablockers should be tried first, reserving long-terminjection sclerotherapy for patients with contraindications or intolerance to beta-blockers or in whom beta-blocker therapy has failed. Surgical rescue in the form of either shunt surgery or lever transplantation should be considered if either treatment fails. A new technique, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPSS) may replace shunt surgery in the future. Beta-blockers is the treatment of choice for primary prophylaxis of variceal haemorrhage and has a role in preventing acute and chronic bleeding from congestive gastropathy. However, the above sequential approach from the least invasive to the more invasive therapeutic options may not be appropriate for all cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.

Matched MeSH terms: Esophageal and Gastric Varices/prevention & control
Endoscopic variceal ligation as primary prophylaxis for oesophageal variceal bleeding at a Malaysian tertiary hospital

Wendy Tan AY, Chieng JY

Med J Malaysia, 2018 12;73(6):361-364.
PMID: 30647204

OBJECTIVE: Approximately one-third of patients with esophageal varices will develop bleeding which is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. Currently, the two most widely used modalities to prevent variceal bleeding are pharmacologic and oendoscopic variceal band ligation (EVL). However, EVL has been associated with significant complications. Hence we aim to evaluate and to identify the epidemiology, demography, and complications of EVL at our local Malaysian tertiary hospital.
METHOD: This is a retrospective study of all the patients that had undergone endoscopic variceal surveillance at the Gastroenterology endoscopy unit, Serdang Hospital from 1st January 2015 to 31st March 2017. Patients' demography, aetiologies of liver cirrhosis, platelet level and international normalised ratio (INR) prior banding procedure, and the post EVL complications were recorded and further analysed with SPSS version 16.
RESULTS: In this study, 105 patients were screened for varices. Fifty-five of them had undergone EVL, with a quarter of the patients requiring repeated ligation. There was a male preponderance with 76.4%. 56.4% of patients were in age from 40-59 years. The majority of our patients were of the Malay ethnicity. The major aetiology for liver cirrhosis in our patients was viral hepatitis with Hepatitis C (31.0%), and Hepatitis B (20.0%). Most of our patients had platelet count >50,000 and INR <1.5 prior to EVL. There was no major complication in all of our subjects.
CONCLUSION: EVL is relatively safe and feasible treatment for prevention of oesophageal variceal bleeds with a low complication rate.

Matched MeSH terms: Esophageal and Gastric Varices/prevention & control*

Filters

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links