MyMedR

Displaying all 17 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Fulltext Epidural buprenorphine and bupivacaine in major gynaecological operations

Loh SP

Med J Malaysia, 1993 Jun;48(2):207-10.
PMID: 8350797

Eight patients underwent major gynaecological operations. Their post-operative analgesia was provided by epidural buprenorphine 0.15 mg and bupivacaine 0.5%. The efficacy and side-effects of this combination were assessed. All patients had satisfactory analgesia ranging in duration from 10 hours to greater than 36 hours after a single dose injection. No significant side-effect was noted.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural/methods*
Fulltext [Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome]

Singh SK, Yahya N, Misiran K, Masdar A, Nor NM, Yee LC

Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2016 May-Jun;66(3):259-64.
PMID: 26993410 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjan.2014.09.009

Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) has become an increasingly popular alternative to traditional labour epidural due to its rapid onset and reliable analgesia provided. This was a prospective, convenient sampling study to determine the effects of CSE analgesia on labour outcome.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural
Levobupivacaine for postoperative epidural analgesia in orthopaedic surgery

Afaf AA, Liu CY, Joanna OS

Clin Ter, 2013;164(2):91-5.
PMID: 23698199 DOI: 10.7417/CT.2013.1524

Levobupivacaine is the S(-)enantiomer of bupivacaine, a long acting amino-ester local anaesthetic agent. Cocktail mixture of levobupivacaine and fentanyl infusion is commonly given via epidural for post-operative analgesia. The concentration of levobupivacaine for optimal pain relief with least side effects remained uncertain.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural*
Epidural analgesia in primigravidae in spontaneous labour at term: a prospective study

Leong EW, Sivanesaratnam V, Oh LL, Chan YK

J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2000 Aug;26(4):271-5.
PMID: 11049237

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively study the intervention rate, duration of labour, malpositions, fetal outcome, maternal satisfaction, voiding complications and adverse events in healthy primigravidae in spontaneous labour at term following epidural analgesia.
METHODS: A prospective randomized study involving 55 patients in the epidural group and 68 in the control pethidine--inhalational entonox group.
RESULTS: There were significantly more obstetric interventions (instrumental deliveries) in the epidural group (p < 0.01). The total duration of labour and the duration of the second stage was prolonged in the epidural group (p < 0.01). There were more malpositions at the second stage of labour in the epidural group (p < 0.02). There were no differences in fetal outcome (Apgar scores and Special Care Nursery admissions). Patients in the epidural group were consistently happier with their method of pain relief (p < 0.01). Two patients required blood patches while another 2 patients had persistent backache post epidural analgesia.
CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia in primigravidae in spontaneous labour at term led to an increased instrumental delivery rate, prolonged duration of labour, greater rate of malpositions in the second stage, increased oxytocin requirements but with no difference in fetal outcomes but with happier mothers as compared to the control group.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural*
Epidural tramadol for postoperative pain relief

Delilkan AE, Vijayan R

Anaesthesia, 1993 Apr;48(4):328-31.
PMID: 8494137

The efficacy of epidurally administered tramadol hydrochloride, a weak centrally acting analgesic, was studied for the relief of postoperative pain. Sixty patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomly allocated to three treatment groups to be given the following agents by the epidural route: group 1 tramadol 50 mg; group 2 tramadol 100 mg; group 3 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%. The drugs were administered at the patients' request with each patient being allowed four doses in the first 24 h following surgery. Blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, arterial blood gas analyses, pain scores, the interval between doses and the occurrence of any side effects were recorded. Pain scores (assessed using a visual analogue scale) were significantly less (p < 0.05) at 3, 12, and 24 h in patients receiving tramadol 100 mg than in those receiving tramadol 50 mg or bupivacaine. The mean interval between doses for groups 1, 2 and 3 was 7.40 h, 9.36 h and 5.98 h respectively. The mean interval in group 2 was significantly longer than in group 3 (p < 0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting in group 2 was significantly higher than in group 3 (p < 0.05).

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural*
Fulltext Acceptability of epidural analgesia for pain relief during labour among Kelantanese women

Sharma S, Mohamad NA, Monga D, Achana S

Med J Malaysia, 1996 Dec;51(4):453-6.
PMID: 10968033

Three hundred and five primigravid women were interviewed at term to assess the acceptability of epidural during labour, and reasons for the decisions. Data was collected on a prestructured proforma which consisted of background information, socio-economic status, knowledge about epidural analgesia, source of information and reasons for choice. Of the 305 patients only 17.3% were willing to receive epidural analgesia. This group consisted of 56.6% non-Malay women. Those employed in professional or skilled jobs (56.6%) also readily consented for epidural. Nearly half the women willing for epidural had received college (tertiary) education (43.3%) and more than a quarter (26.4%) were over 30 years of age. The majority of those who were unwilling had no prior knowledge about the procedure, and refused either out of fear, ignorance, resistance from husbands, on religious grounds or following poor feedback from friends. In order to advocate epidural analgesia, knowledge has to be targeted to the relatively less educated, unemployed women, mainly through the media or personally in the antenatal clinic by doctors and nurses. Services have to be improved as substandard analgesia may send out wrong messages and actually do more harm than good.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural*
Fulltext Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome

Singh SK, Yahya N, Misiran K, Masdar A, Nor NM, Yee LC

Braz J Anesthesiol, 2016 May-Jun;66(3):259-64.
PMID: 27108822 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.09.006

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) has become an increasingly popular alternative to traditional labour epidural due to its rapid onset and reliable analgesia provided. This was a prospective, convenient sampling study to determine the effects of CSE analgesia on labour outcome.

METHODS: One hundred and ten healthy primigravida parturients with a singleton pregnancy of ≥37 weeks gestation and in the active phase of labour were studied. They were enrolled to the CSE (n=55) or Non-CSE (n=55) group based on whether they consented to CSE analgesia. Non-CSE parturients were offered other methods of labour analgesia. The duration of the first and second stage of labour, rate of instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section, and Apgar scores were compared.

RESULTS: The mean duration of the first and second stage of labour was not significantly different between both groups. Instrumental delivery rates between the groups were not significantly different (CSE group, 11% versus Non-CSE group, 16%). The slightly higher incidence of cesarean section in the CSE group (16% versus 15% in the Non-CSE group) was not statistically significant. Neonatal outcome in terms of Apgar score of less than 7 at 1 and 5min was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in the duration of labour, rate of instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section, and neonatal outcome in parturients who received compared to those who did not receive CSE for labour analgesia.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural/methods*
Fulltext Case Study on the effect of Epidural Analgesia on pain management during labour

Ho, S.E., Sumathi, U., Ismail, M.S., Choy, Y.C., Ahmad Zailani, H., Liu, C.Y.

Medicine & Health, 2013;8(1):33-36.
MyJurnal

Child birth is associated with severely painful experience for the parturient, and often exceeds one’s expectations. Even though, severe pain is non life-threatening condition in healthy parturient women, it may lead to undesired neuropsychological consequences. When no analgesia was used, postnatal depression may be more common, and this labour pain leads to the development of post-traumatic stress disorder. Epidural analgesia is now considered gold standard for effective pain relief during labour. We here report a case of a 37-year-old G1 P0 patient at term gestation who successfully used epidural analgesia for labour pain management.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural
Fulltext Spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine and intrathecal morphine versus combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia using Bupivacaine and Epidural infusion of bupivacaine plus fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after hip and knee arthroplasty

Mohd Azizan, G., Karis, M., Noordin, Y.

Journal of Surgical Academia, 2013;3(2):46-53.
MyJurnal

This randomised single-blinded study was conducted to evaluate if there was any difference between spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and intrathecal morphine 0.2mg and combined-spinal epidural using hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% with epidural infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% plus fentanyl 2.0μg/ml for 24 hours, postoperative analgesia following hip and knee arthroplasty, in terms of pain score and side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus and respiratory depression). Eighty patients ASA I or ASA II, aged between 18 to 75 years who underwent knee and hip arthroplasty of approximately 3-4 hours, duration were recruited. They were randomly allocated to one of two groups by using computer generated randomised numbers. The pain score during the postoperative period was evaluated using Visual Analogue Score (VAS pain score) and the side effects were documented and treated accordingly. Results showed that patients in Group 1 and Group 2 were comparable in terms of age, gender, height, weight and race. There was no statistical difference in VAS pain score between the two groups at all times intervals. However, patients in Group 1 had a higher incidence of nausea and pruritus than patients in Group 2. None of the patients in either group, experienced respiratory depression. Thus, it was concluded that both intrathecal morphine 0.2mg and epidural infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% plus fentanyl 2.0μg/ml were comparable in providing postoperative analgesia up to 24 hours following hip and knee arthroplasty. Nevertheless, the use of spinal morphine led to a higher incidence of side effects namely nausea and pruritus.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural
Fulltext Comparison between patient-controlled epidural analgesia and continuous epidural infusion for pain relief after gynaecological surgery

Suhaila, N., Nurlia, Y., Azmil Farid, Z., Melvin, K., Muhammad, M., Nadia, M.N.

Journal of Surgical Academia, 2013;3(2):14-19.
MyJurnal

This prospective, randomised study compared the effectiveness of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) versus continuous epidural infusion (CEI) in providing pain relief post gynaecological surgery. Sixty six ASA I or II patients planned for gynaecological surgery via Pfannensteil incision under combined spinal epidural anaesthesia were recruited. They were randomised into two groups: Group A patients received PCEA while Group B patients received CEI. In the recovery area, both groups received an epidural combination of levobupivacaine 0.1% and fentanyl 2 μg/ml. Group A patients were allowed demand bolus doses of 5 ml with a 20 minute lockout interval, while Group B patients had their epidural infusion initiated at 6 ml/hour with increments as required to a maximum of 12 ml/hour. Pain score and degree of motor blockade was assessed hourly in the first four hours and subsequently at four hourly intervals. Side effects were recorded at four-hourly interval. The total amount of analgesia, number of anaesthetic interventions and patient satisfaction was assessed 24 hours, postoperatively. There was no significant difference in pain score, total amount of analgesia, number of anaesthetic interventions and patient satisfaction. The degree of motor blockade and side effects were comparable between the groups. In conclusion, PCEA was comparable to CEI for pain relief after gynaecological surgery.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural
Fulltext Neuraxial block and postoperative epidural analgesia: effects on outcomes in the POISE-2 trial†

Leslie K, McIlroy D, Kasza J, Forbes A, Kurz A, Khan J, et al.

Br J Anaesth, 2016 Jan;116(1):100-12.
PMID: 26209855 DOI: 10.1093/bja/aev255

BACKGROUND: We assessed associations between intraoperative neuraxial block and postoperative epidural analgesia, and a composite primary outcome of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction, at 30 days post-randomization in POISE-2 Trial subjects.
METHODS: 10 010 high-risk noncardiac surgical patients were randomized aspirin or placebo and clonidine or placebo. Neuraxial block was defined as intraoperative spinal anaesthesia, or thoracic or lumbar epidural anaesthesia. Postoperative epidural analgesia was defined as postoperative epidural local anaesthetic and/or opioid administration. We used logistic regression with weighting using estimated propensity scores.
RESULTS: Neuraxial block was not associated with the primary outcome [7.5% vs 6.5%; odds ratio (OR), 0.89; 95% CI (confidence interval), 0.73-1.08; P=0.24], death (1.0% vs 1.4%; OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.53-1.35; P=0.48), myocardial infarction (6.9% vs 5.5%; OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74-1.12; P=0.36) or stroke (0.3% vs 0.4%; OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.44-2.49; P=0.91). Neuraxial block was associated with less clinically important hypotension (39% vs 46%; OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-1.00; P=0.04). Postoperative epidural analgesia was not associated with the primary outcome (11.8% vs 6.2%; OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.89-2.48; P=0.13), death (1.3% vs 0.8%; OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.35-1.99; P=0.68], myocardial infarction (11.0% vs 5.7%; OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.90-2.61; P=0.11], stroke (0.4% vs 0.4%; OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.18-2.32; P=0.50] or clinically important hypotension (63% vs 36%; OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.95-2.09; P=0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: Neuraxial block and postoperative epidural analgesia were not associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes among POISE-2 subjects.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural/statistics & numerical data*
Near fatal error in management of postoperative epidural analgesia

Wan Mat WR, Yahya N, Izaham A, Abdul Rahman R, Abdul Manap N, Md Zain J

Int J Risk Saf Med, 2014;26(2):57-60.
PMID: 24902502 DOI: 10.3233/JRS-140611

Acute pain service (APS) ensures provision of effective and safe postoperative pain relief. The following cases describe a potentially fatal error in managing patients who receive epidural analgesia postoperatively.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects*
The effectiveness of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with ropivacaine 0.165% with fentanyl 2.0 miroc g/ml or levobupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2.0 micro g/ml as a method of postoperative analgesia after major orthopaedic surgery

Misiran KB, Yahaya LS

Middle East J Anaesthesiol, 2013 Feb;22(1):59-64.
PMID: 23833852

This prospective randomized single-blinded study was conducted to determine whether there were differences in consumption, demand dosing and postoperative analgesia quality between PCEA using ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. Seventy patients with ASA classification I and II aged 18 to 80 years old scheduled for elective total knee replacement or total hip replacement were studied. All patients received CSE and then were randomly allocated to receive either ropivacaine 0.165% (Group A) or levobupivacaine 0.125% (Group B) both added with fentanyl 2.0 mcro g/ml via epidural route. PCEA regime was offered for 48 hours with additional standard orthopaedic practice of oral analgesia (etoricoxib 120 mg OD and paracetamol 1.0 gm QID) on the second postoperative day. Basal infusion of PCEA was at 3.0 ml/hour and discontinued after 24 hours following started of PCEA. The consumption of local anaesthetics used within the first 24 hours (basal + demand) and 48 hours (total basal + total demand) were recorded. The VAS pain score, sedation score, side effects and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate) were also recorded every four hours for 48 hours. This study showed that the total volume of drug used was significantly higher in Group A (163.31+/- 29.01 ml) than Group B (142.69 +/- 30.93ml) (p<0. 01). The mean dose of Group A for the first 48 hours after surgery was 251.43 +/- 70.02mg and was significantly greater than the mean dose of Group B (178.91 +/-42.33 mg) (p<0.01). The numbers of PCEA boluses delivered (D) and PCEA attempts (A) were higher in the Group A (22.37 +/-7.32 and 27.66 +/- 9.12) in contrast to Group B (17.63 +/- 7.71 and 24.40 +/- 11.51) but the differences were not statistically significant. The ratio D/A showed significantly higher in Group A (0.83 +/- 0.13) than Group B (0.74 +/- 0.15) (p<0. 02). The VAS pain score was similar for both groups. One patient in Group B had vomiting and there was no sedation, hypotension, pruritus or motor block recorded in both groups. In conclusion this study showed that both PCEA using ropivacaine 0.165% with fentanyl 2.0 micro g/ml and levobupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2.0 micro g/ml provided effective postoperative analgesia within the first 48 hours of major lower limb orthopaedic surgery despite clinically significant dose difference. There was no hypotension, pruritus, sedation or motor block recorded in both groups.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural*
Fulltext First year's experience with an acute pain service--University Hospital Kuala Lumpur

Vijayan R, Delilkan AE

Med J Malaysia, 1994 Dec;49(4):385-400.
PMID: 7545779

An Acute Pain Service (APS) was started in University Hospital, Kuala Lumpur by the Department of Anaesthesiology in October 1992 for more effective control of postoperative pain. The main modalities of treatment included patient controlled analgesia (PCA) using morphine or pethidine with PCA devises, epidural opiate analgesia (EOA) using tramadol or fentanyl/bupivacaine mixture and subcutaneous administration of morphine or pethidine. Five hundred and fifty-one patients were managed in the first year, with an overall patient satisfaction score of 83%. The majority (98.5%) of them were after abdominal or major orthopaedic surgery. Eighty per cent of patients scored < 3 on the verbal numeric pain scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst imaginable pain, on the first postoperative day. Nausea and vomiting was an unpleasant side effect in 20% of patients.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural
The pregnancy outcome of acyanotic heart disease

Chia P, Raman S, Tham SW

J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 1998 Aug;24(4):267-73.
PMID: 9798356

To study the pregnancy outcome of women with acyanotic heart disease.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural
Fulltext Comparison of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with basal infusion and programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) with PCEA in labour analgesia – A year retrospective study

Zawiah Kassim, Norliza Mohd Nor, Ariffah Mokhtar, Suhaina Mohamad, Sarina Osman, Isqandar Adnan

Journal of Clinical and Health Sciences, 2021;6(1):25-31.
MyJurnal

Introduction: Over three decades, patient-controlled epidural analgesia with a basal infusion
regimen (PCEA+BI) has successfully improved labour analgesia quality due to its advantage
in allowing self-titration by the parturients. Recently, a newer programmed intermittent epidural
bolus with PCEA regimen (PIEB+PCEA) was suggested to improve the epidural spread of
local anaesthetic hence resulted in better analgesia quality and higher maternal satisfaction.
Methods: We conducted a one-year retrospective analysis of data from obstetric analgesia
service record sheet and hospital information system comparing maternal satisfaction towards
their labour analgesia quality, mode of delivery and neonatal Apgar scores between these two
methods of epidural delivery techniques. A total of 343 parturients were recruited in this study
(PCEA+BI n=171, PIEB+PCEA n=172). Results: There were no significant difference in
maternal satisfaction between the two groups (P=0.398) with a higher percentage of excellent
satisfaction were found in the PIEB+PCEA group (PIEB+PCEA 146/172 (84.9%) vs PCEA+BI
138/171 (80.7%)). No significant difference in the mode of delivery (P=0.296). However, the
PIEB+PCEA group shown a higher spontaneous vaginal delivery rate (PIEB+PCEA 87/172
(50.6%) vs PCEA+BI 70/171 (40.9%) and lower Caesarean delivery rate (PIEB+PCEA 71/172
(41.3%) vs PCEA+BI 87/171 (50.9%)). Despite statistically significant differences found in
Apgar scores at 1 minute (P=0.036), there was no significant difference in the scores at 5
minutes (P=0.107). Mean Apgar scores (SD) at 1 minute and 5 minutes for PIEB+ PCEA were
7.77(0.85) and 8.91(0.55) respectively and for PCEA + basal infusion, the scores for 1 minute
and 5 minutes were 7.92(0.39) and 8.98(0.19) respectively. Conclusion: PIEB with PCEA is
a newer epidural delivery technique for labour analgesia which produces a comparable
outcome to PCEA with basal infusion.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural
Fulltext Effect of epidural analgesia on labour: a retrospective comparison study

Norziah Aman, Fatimah Sham, Rashidah Bahari, Aminuddin Ahmad, Normala Salim

Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2020;16(105):73-0.
MyJurnal

Introduction: Epidural analgesia is the most effective method for intra-partum pain relief and most widely applied during childbirth. Various adverse effects of epidural analgesia have been described such as lower rate of sponta- neous vaginal delivery, a higher rate of instrumental vaginal delivery and prolongation of labour, however it remains controversial. The aim of this study to determine the effect of epidural on maternal outcome. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of epidural analgesia on the mothers with epidural and non epidural parturient at Hospital Putrajaya. Methods: Retrospective cohort study was used to collect data through Total Hospital Informa- tion System (THIS) on all delivery cases in Hospital Putrajaya from 1st January to 31st December 2016. A total of 906 mothers was retrospectively investigated in a cohort of 8000 delivery; and was divided into two groups of 453 mothers with epidural analgesia and non-epidural analgesia. Data were analysed using inferential statistics. Results: The mean age in this study was 30.1±4.1 years old with body mass index (BMI) was 28.5±4.5. Univariate analysis demonstrated that epidural group have lower rate of instrumental delivery (34.4%) and caesarean section (30.5%). However, they required more oxytocin used for augmentation (66.4%). The mean duration of first stage of labour was prolong in epidural group (6.0±2.5 hours) compared with non-epidural group (4.3±1.7 hours) while the duration of second stage of labour was also prolong in epidural group (15±19 min) as compared with non-epidural (7±11 min). Conclusion: Epidural analgesia had better maternal outcomes in term of mode of delivery but had adverse effects on duration of labour and oxytocin used.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Epidural

Filters

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links