Displaying all 7 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Johnson PD
    Malayan Medical Journal, 1933;8:199-202.
    Matched MeSH terms: Administration, Rectal
  2. Rhendra Hardy MZ, Zayuah MS, Baharudin A, Wan Aasim WA, Shamsul KH, Hashimah I, et al.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2010 Apr;74(4):374-7.
    PMID: 20129679 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.01.005
    Tonsillectomy is frequently associated with postoperative pain of considerable duration, which is usually accompanied by the substantial consumption of both opioid and non-opioid analgesic such as NSAIDs and local anaesthetics.
    Matched MeSH terms: Administration, Rectal
  3. Tay PYS, Lenton EA
    Med J Malaysia, 2005 Jun;60(2):151-7.
    PMID: 16114155
    This is a prospeve randomised study designed to clarify the impact of various luteal support regimes (HCG and progesterone) on progesterone profiles and pregnancy outcomes. This study involved subjects undergone down regulated. stimulated IVF cycles using various types of luteal support, namely: Cyclogest (n=35). Crinone gel (n=36), various doses of Utrogestan (n=55) and HCG (n=35). Various doses of Utrogestan (administered vaginally), Crinone gel (progesterone administered vaginally) and Cyclogest (progesterone administered rectally) supplementation induced similar end plasma progesterone concentrations ranging from 26 to 32 mmnl/l. These progesterone regimes produced no significant differences. Hence, the impact of exogenous proge,terone supplement was relatively trivial and did not 'stabilise' the sub-optimal luteal phase. In contrast, two small HCG injections during the early and mid-luteal phase possessed a much greater ability to 'stabilise' progesterone profiles. Despite this additional advantage, implantation and pregnancy rates with either HCG or progesterone supplements were similar. Although none of these forms of luteal support adequately 'normalised' luteal progesterone profiles, this did not appear to be detrimental to the process of implantation.
    Matched MeSH terms: Administration, Rectal
  4. Pandey M, Choudhury H, Yi CX, Mun CW, Phing GK, Rou GX, et al.
    Curr Drug Targets, 2018;19(15):1782-1800.
    PMID: 29792143 DOI: 10.2174/1389450119666180523092100
    Diabetes mellitus, a metabolic disorder of glucose metabolism, is mainly associated with insulin resistance to the body cells, or impaired production of insulin by the pancreatic β-cells. Insulin is mainly required to regulate glucose metabolism in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients; however, many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus also require insulin, especially when their condition cannot be controlled solely by oral hypoglycemic agents. Hence, major research is ongoing attempting to improve the delivery of insulin in order to make it more convenient to patients who experience side effects from the conventional treatment procedure or non-adherence to insulin regimen due to multiple comorbid conditions. Conventionally, insulin is administered via subcutaneous route which is also one of the sole reasons of patient's non-compliance due to the invasiveness of this method. Several attempts have been done to improve patient compliance, reduce side effects, improve delivery adherence, and to enhance the pharmaceutical performance of the insulin therapy. Despite facing substantial challenges in developing efficient delivery systems for insulin, vast research studies have been carried out for the development of smart delivery systems to deliver insulin via ocular, buccal, pulmonary, oral, transdermal, as well as rectal routes. Therefore, the present review was aimed to overview the challenges encountered with the current insulin delivery systems and to summarize recent advancements in technology of various novel insulin delivery systems being discovered and introduced in the current market.
    Matched MeSH terms: Administration, Rectal
  5. Navaratnam V, Mansor SM, Mordi MN, Akbar A, Abdullah MN
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 1998 Jul;54(5):411-4.
    PMID: 9754985
    OBJECTIVE: A single cross-over, comparative pharmacokinetic study of oral and rectal formulations of 200 mg artesunic acid in 12 healthy Malaysian volunteers is reported.

    METHODS: Plasma concentrations of artesunic acid and dihydroartemisinin were determined simultaneously by HPLC with electrochemical detection. The test drug was well tolerated and no undesirable adverse effects were observed.

    RESULTS: Comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters of artesunic acid after oral and rectal administration showed statistically significant differences in t(max) and AUC, with no changes for Cmax and t1/2. As for dihydroartemisinin, differences were observed for t(max) and Cmax but not for AUC.

    CONCLUSION: There appear to be pharmacokinetic differences between oral and rectal modes of administration. The significance of these findings should be explored in malaria patients before appropriate therapeutic regimens are devised.

    Matched MeSH terms: Administration, Rectal
  6. Lua GW, Muthukaruppan R, Menon J
    Dig Dis Sci, 2015 Oct;60(10):3118-23.
    PMID: 25757446 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3609-9
    BACKGROUND: Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been shown to reduce the incidence of post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP). There were various trials using different routes and dosages of NSAIDs but meta-analysis revealed inconsistent results.

    AIMS: The aims of this study were to determine the efficacy of rectal diclofenac in preventing PEP and to evaluate any adverse events.

    METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, two-arm, prospective clinical trial. Only patients at high risk of developing PEP were recruited. They received 100 mg rectal diclofenac or no intervention immediately after ERCP. The patients were reviewed 30 days after discharge to evaluate any adverse event.

    RESULTS: Among 144 recruited patients, 69 (47.9%) received diclofenac and 75 (52.1%) had no intervention. Eleven patients (7.6%) developed PEP, in which seven were from the diclofenac group and four were in the control group. Eight cases of PEP (5.5%) were mild and three cases (2.1%) were moderate. The differences in pancreatitis incidence and severity between both groups were not statistically significant. There were 11 adverse events reported. Clinically significant bleeding happened in four patients (2.8%): one from the diclofenac group and three from the control group. Other events included cholangitis: two patients (2.9%) from the diclofenac group and four (5.3%) from the control group. One patient from the diclofenac group (1.4%) had a perforation which was treated conservatively.

    CONCLUSIONS: In summary, prophylactic rectal diclofenac did not significantly decrease the incidence of PEP among patients at high risk for developing PEP. However, the administration of diclofenac was fairly safe with few clinical adverse events.

    Matched MeSH terms: Administration, Rectal
  7. Gul YA, Prasannan S, Jabar FM, Shaker AR, Moissinac K
    World J Surg, 2002 Dec;26(12):1499-502.
    PMID: 12297939 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-002-6529-8
    Endoscopic thermal therapy and formalin are being increasingly recommended for the treatment of chronic hemorrhagic radiation proctitis. It may be too early, however, to discard pharmacologic agents from the management process, especially in medical institutions where specialized equipment is unavailable. We prospectively assessed the effectiveness of medical therapy in 14 consecutive patients with chronic hemorrhagic radiation proctitis from July 1999 to June 2001. All 14 subjects were women (mean age 56 years), 13 of whom had had radiotherapy for cancer of the cervix. The median time to onset of symptoms following irradiation was 16 months. Six patients had a hemoglobin level of < 8 g/dl, and blood transfusion was required in 11 patients. In five patients (36%) initially treated with hydrocortisone enemas prior to referral, this treatment continued; and the remaining nine patients were commenced on sucralfate enemas. Two patients given rectal hydrocortisone continued to bleed and were treated with sucralfate enemas and topical formalin, respectively. Rectal sucralfate suspension effectively procured symptomatic alleviation in all 11 patients. Rectal bleeding recurred in two patients who had been managed exclusively with hydrocortisone and sucralfate enemas, respectively, over a mean follow-up of 6 months. Both patients were managed with topical formalin, which controlled their symptoms. Even though the number of subjects in this study is small, sucralfate enema can be recommended as an effective first-line agent for managing patients with chronic hemorrhagic radiation proctitis. The use of more specialized therapy can therefore be reserved for cases where primary treatment failure occurs with sucralfate therapy.
    Matched MeSH terms: Administration, Rectal
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links