Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Chin WK
    J Clin Pharm Ther, 2018 Feb;43(1):159-162.
    PMID: 29114905 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12648
    WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Literature evidence suggests leukotriene involvement in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. This article aimed to discuss whether the off-label use of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, is justifiable for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.

    COMMENT: Most non-randomized studies supported the use of montelukast for atopic dermatitis treatment. However, evidence from these studies should be interpreted with caution as it is relatively weak due to the absence of randomization, control groups and blinding processes, subjecting the results to high risk of selection and reporting biases. The inconsistent findings across RCTs may be related to the limited number of patients, nuances in study designs, varying severity of disease and the concomitant use of steroids in some of the studies.

    WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Current literature evidence is limited to rationally support the use of montelukast in atopic dermatitis treatment. For now, the conventional treatments should be preferred in the clinical setting.

    Matched MeSH terms: Acetates/therapeutic use
  2. Chin WK, Lee SWH
    Int J Clin Pharm, 2018 Oct;40(5):963-976.
    PMID: 29777328 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-018-0655-3
    Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common form of eczema. As leukotriene mediators are involved in the inflammatory phase of atopic dermatitis, montelukast has been suggested as a possible therapy. Aim of the review To evaluate the safety and efficacy of montelukast off-label use for the treatment atopic dermatitis. Method A search was performed from database inception until March 2018 in six electronic databases for randomized-controlled-trials examining the use of montelukast for AD. Results Among 301 articles screened, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The study populations consist of paediatric and adult subjects with moderate-to-severe AD. Montelukast use was shown to improve symptoms such as pruritus in four studies. Another 2 studies reported that montelukast could improve symptoms similar to the standard regimen of topical steroid and oral antihistamine. However, five studies reported that montelukast had no effects in symptoms alleviation. The use of montelukast was associated with a similar safety profile to placebo and well-tolerated with minimal adverse effects. Conclusion There is limited evidence to suggest that the off-label use of montelukast is effective in treating moderate-to-severe AD. Further research with larger study populations employing standardized endpoint measuring instrument is warranted to further investigate the off-label use of montelukast in AD treatment. Until then, the use of conventional treatments including optimal daily skin hydration should remain the mainstay in the management of atopic dermatitis. In fact, for moderate-to-severe condition, steroid sparing immune-suppressants should still be used clinically until more effective and safer alternative is discovered.
    Matched MeSH terms: Acetates/therapeutic use*
  3. Goh BS, Ismail MI, Husain S
    J Laryngol Otol, 2014 Mar;128(3):242-8.
    PMID: 24618303 DOI: 10.1017/S002221511400036X
    This study investigated improvements in quality of life associated with eight weeks of montelukast and/or intranasal steroid treatment for moderate to severe allergic rhinitis.
    Matched MeSH terms: Acetates/therapeutic use*
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links