Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Michal, C.S., Nadirah, S., Ammar, R., Philip, G., Jayaram, M., Savio, S.
    MyJurnal
    Introduction: Workers in hospitals are exposed to various occupational hazards such as high level disinfectants (HLD).
    Disinfection is an essential component of the endoscope reprocessing. In the Endoscopy Unit of Queen Elizabeth Hospital,
    Succindialdehyde (SA) is used as the disinfectant for endoscope reprocessing. SA has properties that are similar to formaldehyde
    in regard to contact allergies and toxicity. The purpose of this case study is to describe the occurrence of work related symptoms
    (WRS), the proper use of personal protective attire (PPE) and the need of pre-employment health enquiries for those exposed to SA.

    Methodology: This was a cross sectional case study. Twenty eight gastrointestinal assistants (GIA) from the thirty two exposed staff
    working with the Queen Elizabeth Hospital’s Endoscopy Unit, who fulfilled the study criteria, were given a modified Respiratory
    Surveillance Questionnaire. This questionnaireis used as the health surveillance tool for the staff exposed to the occupational
    respiratory hazard by the Occupational Health Unit, University of Edinburgh. Results: Most of the GIAs complained of headache
    (85.7%), skin irritations (60.7%) followed by 57.1% watery eyes, wheeziness and runny nose. Majority (92.9%) of the GIAs wore
    personal protective equipment (PPE) during the disinfection procedure. Pre-employment enquiries regarding asthma, skin and
    mucosal sensitivity problems and lung function were not made to any of the GIAs. Only 14.3% of them do annual health surveillances.

    Conclusion: Most of the GIAs, 92.9% experienced at least one WRS despite wearing PPE. Staff exposed to the chemical disinfectants
    should wear proper PPE and do annual health surveillances. By practising this, we may avoid WRS and treat the staff accordingly.
  2. Deslivia MF, Savio SD, Wiratnaya I, Astawa P, Sandiwidayat KS, Bimantara NG
    Malays Orthop J, 2023 Mar;17(1):98-110.
    PMID: 37064619 DOI: 10.5704/MOJ.2303.012
    INTRODUCTION: Anti-osteoclastic mechanism of Bisphosphonate (BP) is crucial to treat Giant Cell Tumour of the Bone (GCTB), however no established guidelines of its use have been published. This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to summarise recent clinical studies on the subject.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed based on PRISMA guidelines for clinical trials of BP administration in GCTB. Baseline data including BP regimen, dose and timing was summarised. The primary outcomes assessed were recurrence rate, metastases, survival rate, functional outcome, clinical outcome, radiological outcome, and adverse effect.

    RESULTS: We identified 8 articles from 2008-2020. Most studies administer 4mg of Zoledronic acid post-operatively, with five studies mentioning pre-operative administration and six studies describing post-operative administration. There was a total of 181 GCTB cases analysed in this study. The BP group presented lower recurrence rate than control group (three studies; Odds Ratio [OR] 0.15; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.05 - 0.43; p<0.05; heterogeneity, I2=0%). As for survival rate, BP group is comparable to control group (two studies; OR 1.67; 95% CI, 0.06 - 48.46; p=0.77; heterogeneity, I2=65%).

    CONCLUSION: Bisphosphonate therapy offers satisfactory recurrence rate, functional outcome, clinical outcome, radiological outcome, survival rate and metastases rate in patients with GCTB, with minimal adverse effects. Pre- and post-operative administration of bisphosphonates in combination might be the most beneficial in minimalising the recurrence rate.

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links