Displaying all 6 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Phillips KP, Santoso T, Sanders P, Alison J, Chan JLK, Pak HN, et al.
    Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc, 2019 Jun;23:100358.
    PMID: 31008181 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100358
    Background: Left atrial appendage closure is a non-pharmacological alternative for stroke prevention in high-risk non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients, but has not been widely studied in Asian patients. The prospective WASP registry assessed real-world outcomes for patients undergoing WATCHMAN implant in the Asia-Pacific region.

    Methods: Data were collected from consecutive patients across 9 centres. Major endpoints included procedural success, safety and long-term outcomes including occurrence of bleeding, stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic embolism and all-cause mortality.

    Results: Subjects (n = 201) had a mean age of 70.8 ± 9.4 years, high stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc: 3.9 ± 1.7), elevated bleeding risk (HAS-BLED: 2.1 ± 1.2) with 53% patients from Asian countries. Successful implantation occurred in 98.5% of patients; 7-day device/procedure-related SAE rate was 3.0%. After 2 years of follow-up, the rates of ischaemic stroke/TIA/SE and major bleeding were 1.9 and 2.2 per 100-PY, respectively, representing relative reductions of 77% and 49% versus expected rates per risk scores. The relative risk reductions versus expected rates were more pronounced in Asians vs. Non-Asians (89% vs 62%; 77% vs 14%). Other significant findings included larger mean LAA ostium diameter for Asians vs. Non-Asians (23.4 ± 4.1 mm vs. 21.2 ± 3.2 mm, p p 

  2. Kamsani SH, Emami M, Young GD, Dimasi C, Pathak RK, Wilsmore B, et al.
    Heart Rhythm, 2024 Nov 07.
    PMID: 39515499 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.10.070
    BACKGROUND: Different iterations of catheter and energy delivery system configurations are evolving for pulsed field ablation (PFA); however, some have used large and complex catheters, required large sheaths, and had a recognized risk of hemolysis.

    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute safety and efficacy of a custom designed 8F variable loop multielectrode mapping and PFA catheter with contact sensing.

    METHODS: This acute feasibility study recruited 30 patients undergoing de novo ablation of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The ElectroPulse Study is a first-in-human, nonrandomized, prospective study of a novel PFA system that utilizes an 8F, 10-electrode variable loop steerable mapping and ablation catheter with 2800-V biphasic bipolar waveform. All patients had pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and posterior wall isolation (PWI) using the PFA system. The main outcomes were the acute success of PV/PWI and periprocedural serious adverse events.

    RESULTS: Complete PVI/PWI was successfully achieved in all 30 patients using 59.7 ± 7.2 applications. Total procedural time was 113.6 ± 26.3 minutes, fluoroscopy time 8.0 ± 5.5 minutes, and left atrial dwell time 78.7 ± 18.6 minutes. There was no esophageal injury, phrenic nerve palsy, clinical stroke, or death. Brain magnetic resonance imaging detected 2 new but transient silent cerebral lesions. Two patients (6.7%) had vascular access complications. Although there were changes in the biomarkers for hemolysis, none of the patients experienced clinical hemolysis or related acute kidney injury.

    CONCLUSION: This first-in-human study demonstrated that PFA using a novel variable loop catheter with a contact sensing system safely achieved 100% acute PVI/PWI with safety profile comparable to existing PFA systems.

  3. Parthiban N, Esterman A, Mahajan R, Twomey DJ, Pathak RK, Lau DH, et al.
    J Am Coll Cardiol, 2015 Jun 23;65(24):2591-2600.
    PMID: 25983009 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.029
    BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) is an established technology integrated into clinical practice. One recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) and several large device database studies have demonstrated a powerful survival advantage for ICD patients undergoing RM compared with those receiving conventional in-office (IO) follow-up.

    OBJECTIVES: This study sought to conduct a systematic published data review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing RM with IO follow-up.

    METHODS: Electronic databases and reference lists were searched for RCTs reporting clinical outcomes in ICD patients who did or did not undergo RM. Data were extracted from 9 RCTs, including 6,469 patients, 3,496 of whom were randomized to RM and 2,973 to IO follow-up.

    RESULTS: In the RCT setting, RM demonstrated clinical outcomes comparable with office follow-up in terms of all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.83; p = 0.285), cardiovascular mortality (OR: 0.66; p = 0.103), and hospitalization (OR: 0.83; p = 0.196). However, a reduction in all-cause mortality was noted in the 3 trials using home monitoring (OR: 0.65; p = 0.021) with daily verification of transmission. Although the odds of receiving any ICD shock were similar in RM and IO patients (OR: 1.05; p = 0.86), the odds of inappropriate shock were reduced in RM patients (OR: 0.55; p = 0.002).

    CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrates that RM and IO follow-up showed comparable overall outcomes related to patient safety and survival, with a potential survival benefit in RCTs using daily transmission verification. RM benefits include more rapid clinical event detection and a reduction in inappropriate shocks.

  4. Kamsani SH, Middeldorp ME, Chiang G, Stefil M, Evans S, Nguyen MT, et al.
    Heart Rhythm O2, 2024 Jun;5(6):341-350.
    PMID: 38984365 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.05.003
    BACKGROUND: Inpatient monitoring is recommended for sotalol initiation.

    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of outpatient sotalol commencement.

    METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective, observational study of patients initiated on sotalol in an outpatient setting. Serial electrocardiogram monitoring at day 3, day 7, 1 month, and subsequently as clinically indicated was performed. Corrected QT (QTc) interval and clinical events were evaluated.

    RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2023, 880 consecutive patients who were commenced on sotalol were evaluated. Indications were atrial fibrillation/flutter in 87.3% (n = 768), ventricular arrhythmias in 9.9% (n = 87), and other arrhythmias in 2.8% (n = 25). The daily dosage at initiation was 131.0 ± 53.2 mg/d. The QTc interval increased from baseline (431 ± 32 ms) to 444 ± 37 ms (day 3) and 440 ± 33 ms (day 7) after sotalol initiation (P < .001). Within the first week, QTc prolongation led to the discontinuation of sotalol in 4 and dose reduction in 1. No ventricular arrhythmia, syncope, or death was observed during the first week. Dose reduction due to asymptomatic bradycardia occurred in 3 and discontinuation due to dyspnea in 3 within the first week. Overall, 1.1% developed QTc prolongation (>500 ms/>25% from baseline); 4 within 3 days, 1 within 1 week, 4 within 60 days, and 1 after >3 years. Discontinuation of sotalol due to other adverse effects occurred in 41 patients within the first month of therapy.

    CONCLUSION: Sotalol initiation in an outpatient setting with protocolized follow-up is safe, with no recorded sotalol-related mortality, ventricular arrhythmias, or syncope. There was a low incidence of significant QTc prolongation necessitating discontinuation within the first month of treatment. Importantly, we observed a small incidence of late QT prolongation, highlighting the need for vigilant outpatient surveillance of individuals on sotalol.

  5. Wong CX, Tse HF, Choi EK, Chao TF, Inoue K, Poppe K, et al.
    Nat Rev Cardiol, 2024 Dec;21(12):841-843.
    PMID: 39322762 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-024-01091-1
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links