MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective data on 130 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstructions was analysed. Their preoperative magnetic resonance images (MRI) were reviewed for the presence of posterolateral tibial bone bruise. The presence of meniscal injuries was recorded based on the arthroscopic findings from the operative records.
RESULTS: 95 patients were recruited into the study. The prevalence of posterolateral bone bruise in this study was 41%. There was a statistically significant difference when comparing the prevalence of bone bruising to the time of injury to MRI (p<0.001). The prevalence of an injury to at least one meniscus at the time of ACLR surgery was 83.2%. The prevalence of lateral meniscus injuries in patients with bone bruise was found to be 53.9%. The crude odds ratio of a patient having a lateral meniscal tear in the presence of bone bruising was 1.56 (0.68, 3.54). This figure was even higher when it was adjusted for time to MRI and was 2.06 (0.77, 5.46).
CONCLUSION: Prevalence of posterolateral tibial bone bruising in our study was 41%, and the prevalence of meniscal injury to either meniscus at the point of surgery was 83.2%, out of which the lateral meniscus tears were identified during ACLR surgery in 47.3% of the patients. We found there was no association between posterolateral tibial bone bruising to sex, age and mode of injury, but was sensitive to the interval between time of injury and MRI. The overall prevalence of lateral meniscal tears was higher in patients with posterolateral bone bruising but was not statistically significant with a P value of 0.31; however, the Crude odd ratio was 1.56 (0.68, 3.54) and was higher when adjusted to time of injury to MRI 2.06 (0.77, 5.46). We suggest for MRI to be done as soon as possible after injury in regard to bone bruising identification. We should be vigilant to look for lateral meniscal tears and anticipate for its repair in ACL injuries, especially so when we identify posterolateral tibial bruising on the preoperative MRI.
METHOD AND MATERIALS: The electronic search was carried out using PubMed/MEDLINEⓇdatabases with the keywords "tissue engineering AND meniscus" spanning the period of publications from Jan 1980 until Dec 2022.
RESULTS: The literature search identified 405 references in PubMed/MEDLINE, and 179 were selected following the eligibility requirements. The research analysis showed that the existing meniscal tissue engineering studies used a wide variety of seed cells, cytokines, bioactive materials and 3D structures. Each showed distinct advantages and disadvantages in terms of biocompatibility, degradability, mechanical strength, porosity, and etc. It was noted that 3D printing technology is promising for tissue engineering meniscus research. In addition, the optimal use of compression and hydrostatic pressure to markedly improve the functional properties of tissue-engineering meniscal can serve as an useful strategy.
CONCLUSION: This review analysed the different approaches employed for meniscus tissue engineering and regeneration. Meniscal tissue engineering still faces several major challenges in terms of seed cells, choice of materials and 3D printing strategies, which should be effectively overcome to harness the full potential of this technology.