PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the cost-effectiveness and PROMs between digitally and conventionally fabricated complete dentures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search of publications from 2011 to mid-2023 was established using PubMed/Medline, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar. Retrospective, prospective, randomized controlled, and randomized crossover clinical studies on at least 10 participants were included. A total of 540 articles were identified and assessed at the title, abstract, and full article level, resulting in the inclusion of 14 articles. Data on cost, number of visits, patient satisfaction, and oral health-related quality of life were examined and reported.

RESULTS: The systematic review included 572 digitally fabricated complete dentures and 939 conventionally fabricated complete dentures inserted in 1300 patients. Digitally fabricated complete dentures require less clinical time with a lower total cost, despite higher material costs compared with the conventional fabrication technique. Digitally and conventionally fabricated complete dentures were found to have significant effects on mastication efficiency, comfort, retention, stability, ease of cleaning, phonetics, and overall patient satisfaction, as well as social disability, functional limitation, psychological discomfort, physical pain, and handicap.

METHODS: Tooth wear status of NPC survivors were clinically assessed using the Exact Tooth Wear Index. A tooth was graded to have severe wear when more than one-third of its buccal/occlusal/lingual surface had dentine loss. At the subject-level, percentages of anterior/posterior/all teeth with severe wear were calculated. Age, number of teeth, flow-rate/buffering capacity/pH of stimulated whole (SWS) and parotid (SPS) saliva's were collected. Correlation and multiple-linear regression tests were performed at the significance level α = 0.05.

RESULT: Sixty-eight participants (mean age of 60.0 ± 8.9), 697 anterior and 686 posterior teeth were examined with a mean of 10-years post-radiotherapy. Severe tooth wear was found in 63 (92.6 percent) participants, 288 anterior and 83 posterior teeth. The mean percentage of anterior/posterior/all teeth with severe wear were 42.3 ± 28.1, 14.5 ± 19.9 and 30.0 ± 21.7. Anterior teeth, particularly the incisal surface of central incisors were most affected. The mean flow-rate of SWS and SPS were 0.1 ± 0.1 ml/min and 0.03 ± 0.07 ml/min respectively. Thirty (44.1 percent) and 48 (70.6 percent) participants were found to have low/no buffering capacity of SWS and SPS respectively. Multiple-regression analyses revealed the SWS flow-rate was associated with the percentage of anterior teeth with severe wear (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION: Anterior tooth wear is a significant dental problem among NPC survivors and was associated with hypo-salivation.