Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Breadmore MC, Wuethrich A, Li F, Phung SC, Kalsoom U, Cabot JM, et al.
    Electrophoresis, 2017 01;38(1):33-59.
    PMID: 27678139 DOI: 10.1002/elps.201600331
    One of the most cited limitations of capillary (and microchip) electrophoresis is the poor sensitivity. This review continues to update this series of biennial reviews, first published in Electrophoresis in 2007, on developments in the field of on-line/in-line concentration methods in capillaries and microchips, covering the period July 2014-June 2016. It includes developments in the field of stacking, covering all methods from field amplified sample stacking and large volume sample stacking, through to isotachophoresis, dynamic pH junction, and sweeping. Attention is also given to on-line or in-line extraction methods that have been used for electrophoresis.
  2. Breadmore MC, Grochocki W, Kalsoom U, Alves MN, Phung SC, Rokh MT, et al.
    Electrophoresis, 2019 01;40(1):17-39.
    PMID: 30362581 DOI: 10.1002/elps.201800384
    One of the most cited limitations of capillary and microchip electrophoresis is the poor sensitivity. This review continues to update this series of biannual reviews, first published in Electrophoresis in 2007, on developments in the field of online/in-line concentration methods in capillaries and microchips, covering the period July 2016-June 2018. It includes developments in the field of stacking, covering all methods from field-amplified sample stacking and large-volume sample stacking, through to isotachophoresis, dynamic pH junction, and sweeping. Attention is also given to online or in-line extraction methods that have been used for electrophoresis.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links