Cholera is a major infectious disease, affecting millions of lives annually. In endemic areas, implementation of vaccination strategy against cholera is vital. As the use of safer live vaccine that can induce protective immunity against Vibrio cholerae O139 infection is a promising approach for immunization, we have designed VCUSM21P, an oral cholera vaccine candidate, which has ctxA that encodes A subunit of ctx and mutated rtxA/C, ace and zot mutations. VCUSM21P was found not to disassemble the actin of HEp2 cells. It colonized the mice intestine approximately 1 log lower than that of the Wild Type (WT) strain obtained from Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. In the ileal loop assay, unlike WT challenge, 1×10⁶ and 1×10⁸ colony forming unit (CFU) of VCUSM21P was not reactogenic in non-immunized rabbits. Whereas, the reactogenicity caused by the WT in rabbits immunized with 1×10¹⁰ CFU of VCUSM21P was found to be reduced as evidenced by absence of fluid in loops administered with 1×10²-1×10⁷ CFU of WT. Oral immunization using 1×10¹⁰ CFU of VCUSM21P induced both IgA and IgG against Cholera Toxin (CT) and O139 lipopolysaccharides (LPS). The serum vibriocidal antibody titer had a peak rise of 2560 fold on week 4. Following Removable Intestinal Tie Adult Rabbit Diarrhoea (RITARD) experiment, the non-immunized rabbits were found not to be protected against lethal challenge with 1×10⁹ CFU WT, but 100% of immunized rabbits survived the challenge. In the past eleven years, V. cholerae O139 induced cholera has not been observed. However, attenuated VCUSM21P vaccine could be used for vaccination program against potentially fatal endemic or emerging cholera caused by V. cholerae O139.
In our previous study, complete protection was observed in rabbit immunized with 1 × 1010 CFU of live attenuated VCUSM21P vaccine against challenge with 1 × 109 CFU Vibrio cholerae O139. In the present study, we investigated whether the vaccines can effectively protect immunized animals from any pathologic changes using histological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural techniques. Severe pathology is evident in wild type injected ileum in non-immunized, showing extensive villous destruction, edema, necrosis and inflammation with infiltration of large numbers of inflammatory cells, extensive damage to the villi and microvilli with pore formation. Histology of ileum injected with wild type in immunized rabbit shows no significant pathological changes except for a few inflammatory cells in lamina propria with mild edema in mucosa and submucosa. immunohistochemical staining revealed O139 antigens of wild type are seen in the lamina propria of edematous villi, muscularis mucosa and submucosa with weak presence in the muscle coat in non-immunized rabbit after challenged with wild type in non-immunized rabbits, but in immunized rabbit localisation of the O139 LPS antigen is seen at the tips of the intact villi, within lamina propria and muscularis mucosa only. These observations suggest that the vaccine can effectively protect animals from any pathologic changes and eliminate V. cholerae O139 from the immunized animals.
We describe four patients with a positive culture of AmpC β-lactamases-producing Escherichia coli (E. coli), despite the fact that our understanding of plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases (pAmpC) is currently limited. Three out of four cases of AmpC β-lactamases-producing Escherichia coli were isolated from a urine sample, and one was from a peritoneal fluid sample. All four isolates are resistant to cefoxitin disc and were subjected to a confirmatory AmpC phenotypic test (AmpC induction test) and monoplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the determination of six pAmpC genotypes (blaDHA, blaEBC, blaMOX, blaFOX, blaACC, and blaCIT). All four E. coli isolates tested negative for the AmpC induction test, while monoplex PCR analysis was positive only for the blaDHA pAmpC genotype and negative for all five other genotypes (blaEBC, blaMOX, blaFOX, blaACC, and blaCIT). A common clinical characteristic across all patients was fever. One patient was treated for perforated sigmoid diverticulitis, while the other three patients were treated for acute pyelonephritis or urinary tract infections (UTIs). Each patient improved significantly and was successfully discharged.