The importance of nontechnical skills among healthcare professionals is gaining widespread recognition as critical
elements complementing technical skills that are used to improve patients’ safety. These skills are typically acquired
through simulation training which has emerged as an effective way to complement clinical training. Effective simulation
requires structure and effective debriefing methods to enhance its learning outcome. In previous literature, evidence of the
effectiveness of healthcare simulation was available but studies evaluating debriefing method(s) remain sparse. In this
paper, the effectiveness of debriefing methods in eight studies on the acquisition of nontechnical skills among healthcare
professionals is reviewed. Articles published from 1st January 2016 across three different databases were referred to. The
results of the review show a statistically significant improvement in the performance of nontechnical and technical skills
across different professionals through various methods of debriefing. Nontechnical skills such as teamwork, effective
communication, decision-making, and situational awareness have improved significantly. In addition, integration of
realism in simulation learning has begun to emerge as an effective technique of providing a real world experience.
However, there was lack of detailed information on the length and type of debriefing conducted in the studies. These
methods clearly require further research since the key to successful simulation learning is through debriefing which is
the heart of simulation.
Medical emergency on board is a new phenomenon that lack of attention. Despite the
presence of cabin crew who is certified to provide medical care to the passenger, failure to
acquire the non-technical skills and low level of knowledge and technical skills retention is
reported to be major challenges in developing a highly competent cabin crew in providing
effective medical care. Having the ability to design simulations, implement it into teaching,
and effectively evaluate simulated performance is starting to become a key role for educators
in health care. For most educators, a practical knowledge and skills gap resides between
the need for simulation learning and proficiencies in designing and utilising simulation. The
purpose of this model was to develop a ‘trained educators’ from the aviation industry with
the knowledge and skills to utilise simulation effectively. The steps involve identification,
development, and integration with a follow-up assessment. The implementation of the program
yielded a significant improvement on the participants’ knowledge, t (129) = -6.27, p
< .001 together with a total DASH-SV score of 6.32. The barriers, including difficulties
encountered executing the model, are discussed combined with the implication for future application.
This model is an effective approach for developing a trained educator in first aid
for aviation incorporated with simulation learning. The trained educator will then become
a pioneer and train another organisation.
Introduction: Diverse tools dedicated to the assessment of various NTS components during cardiopulmonary resuscitation have been published for medical professionals, nevertheless there are no precise measures for the assessment of emergency resuscitation relevant in the context of non-medical community. The aim of the study is to combine and develop a valid and reliable nontechnical skills (NTS) tool for basic life support emergency resuscitation training via simulation learning for flight attendant. Methods: (1) Selection and combination of relevant items into a draft instrument with a UKM specialist team. (2) Obtaining the expert’s review from various specialty for content validity. (3) Instrument testing through pilot study on five recorded simulated case scenarios involving four different elements of nontechnical skills (teamwork, communication, decision making & situation awareness) which were demonstrated in a medical emergency (acute myocardial infarction) (4) Obtaining the internal consistency & inter-rater reliability of the instrument. Results: Through expert review, selected items had been found to have an excellent total content validity index of 1.00. A single mean of both raters yielded a good internal consistency of 0.77. Strong correlations of both ratings from raters in each video ranging from 0.69 to 0.93 (p < .05). There was a good inter-rater reliability (ICC 0.68) and a good agreement (Kappa 0.62 – 0.81) among raters. Conclusion: The CETAM was found to be a reliable and valid instrument and should be beneficial for the measurement of NTS, nevertheless further evaluation is required to fully determined its properties before reaching definitive conclusion.
Introduction: To develop quality cabin crews, trainings involve simulation-based education (SBE) with structured debriefings – a significant component which plays a critical role in optimising learning outcomes. Previous studies have empirically tested the efficacy of the DIAMOND-structured debriefing model and found significant improve- ment and retention of the cabin crews’ knowledge and skills. This study was aimed to explore the elements of the DIAMOND-structured debriefing model that have been known to promote the acquisition and retention of knowl- edge and skills in basic life support (BLS). Methods: A qualitative study was conducted with a random sample of 16 individual cabin crew members who participated in an in-depth interview with 13 open-ended questions for 45 – 60 minutes. The interviews were transcribed and independently analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: The codes which have emerged during data analysis were clustered into three themes: (1) Cognitive, with three sub- themes: engagement, learning environment, and ability to reflect; (2) Methodology, with three sub-themes: concept of debriefing, techniques of questioning, and additional elements; as well as (3) Psychosocial, with five sub-themes: attitude, self-awareness, relationships, self-confidence, and work culture. Several suggestions have emerged, such as the implementation of the model. Conclusion: The DIAMOND-structured debriefing model was a method to reduce cognitive load, which in turn allowed individuals to organise their knowledge, reflect individually and collectively, as well as structure their ideas. It has showed that the elements has a positive impact on the cabin crews’ acquisition and retention of knowledge and skills which will improve the performance and patient safety.
The importance of non-technical skills among healthcare professionals is gaining a widespread recognition as critical elements complementing the technical skills used for improving patients’ safety. These skills are typically acquired through simulation training, which emerged as an effective way to complement clinical training. Non-technical skills frequently use high-fidelity simulation followed by a facilitated discussion known as debriefing. Debriefing by a skilled facilitator is thought to be essential for effective learning through reflective processes. Unfortunately, evidence to support the elements which contributes towards the effectiveness of debriefing remains sparse. We review the studies where elements of debriefing that have been manipulated and its effectiveness on the acquisition of non-technical skills among healthcare professionals through eight publications across four different databases. Non-technical skills performance improved after manipulated debriefing such as multimedia debrief, self-led debrief or no debrief. Besides, there was no added performance when video recording was added to facilitator-led debriefing. The application of learning theory on specific elements together with the application of selected debriefing models is highly encouraging for effective debriefing.