METHODS: We analysed the total visits and discharge rates during periods of using the nebulizer and current pMDI-VMMS methods. The acceptance of pMDI-VMMS by patients and assistant medical officers (AMOs) were assessed by questionnaire.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We analysed 3184 ED visits and responses from 103 patients and 32 AMOs. The direct discharge rate was similar for both nebulizer (n = 2162, 92.5%) and pMDI-VMMS method (n = 768, 90.7%) (p-value = 0.120). Twenty-eight patients (27.2%) favoured the pMDI-VMMS over the nebulizer, whereas 36 patients (35.0%) had no preference for either method. Sixty-four patients (62.1%) felt that the current pMDI-VMMS method was better or at least as effective in relieving their symptoms as a nebulizer. The current method was favoured over the nebulizer by twenty-seven AMOs (84.4%). Twenty-eight (87.5%) AMOs suggested that the current method was more effective than the nebulizer.
WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The bronchodilator delivered via pMDI-VMMS appeared to be comparable to nebulizer in treating mild to moderate asthma and COPD exacerbations in the outpatient ED. Most patients and AMOs accepted the use of pMDI-VMMS in the outpatient ED during the current COVID-19 pandemic. The Venturi mask modified spacer can be a cheap and effective alternative to the commercial spacer in a resource-limited situation.
METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study included all STEMI patients who received thrombolytic therapy from 2016 to 2020 in a Malaysian tertiary hospital. Total population sampling was used in this study. The primary outcome was bleeding events post-thrombolysis, categorised using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) bleeding criteria. Inferential statistics were used to determine the associations between relevant variables.
RESULTS: Data from 941 patients were analysed. A total of 156 (16.6%) STEMI patients bled post-thrombolysis. Major, minor, and minimal TIMI occurred in 7 (0.7%), 17 (1.8%), and 132 (14.0%) patients, respectively. Age 65 years (P=0.031) and Malaysian Chinese (P=0.008) were associated with a higher incidence of bleeding post-thrombolysis. Conversely, foreigners (P=0.032) and current smoker (P=0.007) were associated with a lower incidence of bleeding. Both TIMI major (P<0.001) and TIMI minor (P<0.001) were associated with a higher incidence of all-cause in-hospital mortality among STEMI patients. TIMI minor bleeding was significantly higher in the streptokinase recipients. The bleeding sites were comparable between streptokinase and tenecteplase recipients, except for a significantly higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding in the streptokinase recipients (P=0.027).
CONCLUSION: In our Asian population, the incidence of total bleeding events following STEMI thrombolysis is comparable to that previously reported. The development of TIMI major and minor bleeding complications is associated with higher mortality.
METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study analysed data on consecutive STEMI patients who received thrombolytic therapy from May 2019 to December 2020 (20 months) in a non-PCI capable tertiary hospital. Total population sampling was used in this study. We compared all patients' characteristics and outcomes ten months before and during the pandemic. Regression models were used to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on door-to-needle time (DNT), mortality, bleeding events, and the number of overnight stays.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We analysed 323 patients with a mean age of 52.9 ± 12.9 years and were predominantly male (n = 280, 88.9%). There was a 12.5% reduction in thrombolysis performed during the pandemic. No significant difference in timing from symptoms onset to thrombolysis and DNT was observed. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher during the pandemic (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.02-4.00, p = 0.044). Bleeding events post thrombolysis remained stable and there was no significant difference in the number of overnight stays during the pandemic.
CONCLUSION: STEMI thrombolysis cases were reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic, with an inverse increase in mortality despite the preserved Emergency Department performance in timely thrombolysis.