MyMedR

Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Fulltext Clinical Disease Measures in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis

Burden AD, Choon SE, Gottlieb AB, Navarini AA, Warren RB

Am J Clin Dermatol, 2022 Jan;23(Suppl 1):39-50.
PMID: 35061231 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-021-00653-0

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare neutrophilic skin condition characterized by episodes of widespread eruption of sterile macroscopic pustules that can be associated with systemic inflammation. The rarity of GPP and its heterogeneous cutaneous and extracutaneous symptoms pose considerable challenges to the development and adoption of comprehensive accurate disease measures for the routine clinical assessment of disease severity and the evaluation of new treatments in clinical trials. Psoriasis disease measures remain among the most commonly used methods for evaluating patients with GPP, despite their limitations owing to a lack of assessment of pustules (a hallmark of GPP), systemic inflammation, and disease symptoms. The adaptation of psoriasis disease measures and the development of assessment tools specific for GPP severity will enable more effective and accurate monitoring of patients with GPP and enhance the clinical development of new therapies. Further clinical validation of recently developed modified assessment tools, such as the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment and the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and international consensus on using quantitative tools and patient-reported outcome measures in the development of new treatments are needed to advance patient care.
Generalized pustular psoriasis: A global Delphi consensus on clinical course, diagnosis, treatment goals and disease management

Puig L, Choon SE, Gottlieb AB, Marrakchi S, Prinz JC, Romiti R, et al.

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2023 Apr;37(4):737-752.
PMID: 36606566 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18851

BACKGROUND: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare and highly heterogeneous skin disease, characterized by flares of neutrophilic pustules and erythema. As a rare disease with few clinical studies and no standardized management approaches, there is a paucity of knowledge regarding GPP.
OBJECTIVES: Conduct a Delphi panel study to identify current evidence and gain advanced insights into GPP.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was used to identify published literature and develop statements categorized into four key domains: clinical course and flare definition; diagnosis; treatment goals; and holistic management. Statements were rated on a Likert scale by a panel of dermatologists in two rounds of online questionnaires; the threshold for consensus was agreement by ≥80%.
RESULTS: Twenty-one panellists reached consensus on 70.9%, 61.8%, 100.0% and 81.8% of statements in the 'clinical course and flare definition', 'diagnosis', 'treatment goals' and 'holistic management of GPP' domains, respectively. There was clear consensus on GPP being phenotypically, genetically and immunologically distinct from plaque psoriasis. Clinical course is highly variable, with an extensive range of complications. Clinical and histologic features supporting GPP diagnosis reached high levels of agreement, and although laboratory evaluations were considered helpful for diagnosis and monitoring disease severity, there was uncertainty around the value of individual tests. All acute and long-term treatment goals reached consensus, including rapid and sustained clearance of pustules, erythema, scaling and crust, clearance of skin lesions and prevention of new flares. Potential triggers, associated comorbidities and differential diagnoses achieved low rates of consensus, indicating that further evidence is needed.
CONCLUSIONS: Global consensus between dermatologists was reached on clinically meaningful goals for GPP treatment, on key features of GPP flares and on approaches for assessing disease severity and multidisciplinary management of patients. On this basis, we present a management algorithm for patients with GPP for use in clinical practice.
Health-related quality of life in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis: A systematic literature review

Choon SE, De La Cruz C, Wolf P, Jha RK, Fischer KI, Goncalves-Bradley DC, et al.

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2024 Feb;38(2):265-280.
PMID: 37750484 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.19530

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, chronic, neutrophilic inflammatory skin disease characterized by episodes of widespread eruption of sterile, macroscopic pustules that can be accompanied by systemic inflammation and symptoms. A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis were conducted to determine the impact of GPP on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-reported severity of symptoms and to compare its impact to patients with plaque psoriasis (plaque PsO). Searches were undertaken in Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from 1 January 2002 to 15 September 2022. Screening was carried out by two reviewers independently. Outcome measures included generic (e.g. EQ-5D, SF-36) and dermatology-specific (e.g. DLQI) clinical outcome assessments, and other relevant patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (e.g. severity of pain measured by a numerical rating scale). Overall, 20 studies were found to be eligible for inclusion, of which seven also had data for plaque PsO. The DLQI was the most frequently reported outcome measure (16 out of 20 studies). When reported, mean DLQI (SD) scores varied from 5.7 (1.2) to 15.8 (9.6) across the studies, indicating a moderate to very large effect on HRQoL; the wide range of scores and large SDs were explained by the small population sizes (n ≤ 12 for all studies except two). Similar ranges and large SDs were also observed for other measures within individual studies. However, in general, people with GPP reported a greater impact of their skin condition on HRQoL, when compared to people with plaque PsO (i.e. higher DLQI scores) and higher severity for itch, pain and fatigue. This systematic review highlighted the need for studies with a larger population size, a better understanding of the impact of cutaneous and extracutaneous symptoms and comorbidities on HRQoL during and between GPP flares, and outcome measures specifically tailored to the unique symptoms and the natural course/history of GPP.
Fulltext Towards global consensus on core outcomes for hidradenitis suppurativa research: an update from the HISTORIC consensus meetings I and II

Thorlacius L, Garg A, Ingram JR, Villumsen B, Theut Riis P, Gottlieb AB, et al.

Br J Dermatol, 2018 03;178(3):715-721.
PMID: 29080368 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16093

BACKGROUND: A core outcomes set (COS) is an agreed minimum set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials for a specific condition. Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has no agreed-upon COS. A central aspect in the COS development process is to identify a set of candidate outcome domains from a long list of items. Our long list had been developed from patient interviews, a systematic review of the literature and a healthcare professional survey, and initial votes had been cast in two e-Delphi surveys. In this manuscript, we describe two in-person consensus meetings of Delphi participants designed to ensure an inclusive approach to generation of domains from related items.
OBJECTIVES: To consider which items from a long list of candidate items to exclude and which to cluster into outcome domains.
METHODS: The study used an international and multistakeholder approach, involving patients, dermatologists, surgeons, the pharmaceutical industry and medical regulators. The study format was a combination of formal presentations, small group work based on nominal group theory and a subsequent online confirmation survey.
RESULTS: Forty-one individuals from 13 countries and four continents participated. Nine items were excluded and there was consensus to propose seven domains: disease course, physical signs, HS-specific quality of life, satisfaction, symptoms, pain and global assessments.
CONCLUSIONS: The HISTORIC consensus meetings I and II will be followed by further e-Delphi rounds to finalize the core domain set, building on the work of the in-person consensus meetings.