METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 500 systematically sampled pharmacy students from two private and one public university. A validated, self-administered questionnaire comprised of seven sections was used to gather the data. A systematic sampling was applied to recruit the students. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were applied using SPSS® version 18.

RESULTS: Overall, the students tend to disagree that complementary therapies (CM) are a threat to public health (mean score = 3.6) and agreed that CMs include ideas and methods from which conventional medicine could benefit (mean score = 4.7). More than half (57.8%) of the participants were currently using CAM while 77.6% had used it previously. Among the current CAM modalities used by the students, CM (21.9%) was found to be the most frequently used CAM followed by Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) (21%). Most of the students (74.8%) believed that lack of scientific evidence is one of the most important barriers obstructing them to use CAM. More than half of the students perceived TCM (62.8%) and music therapy (53.8%) to be effective. Majority of them (69.3%) asserted that CAM knowledge is necessary to be a well-rounded professional.

METHODS: The HALES observational study, conducted at 33 sites (Hong Kong, Thailand, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and Australia) comprised (1) chart review of patients who received evolocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i), and (2) physician/patient survey and one-time data collection of patients with high cardiovascular risk initiating evolocumab or initiating/continuing non-PCSK9i lipid-lowering therapy. Patients could only enroll in (1) or (2).