Displaying all 13 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Chaubal T, Bapat R, Wadkar P
    QJM, 2017 Aug 01;110(8):527.
    PMID: 28453856 DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcx090
  2. Chaubal T, Bapat R
    Am J Med, 2018 09;131(9):e371-e372.
    PMID: 29730363 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.04.020
  3. Chaubal T, Bapat R
    Am J Med, 2017 Dec;130(12):e533-e534.
    PMID: 28716459 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.06.016
  4. Chaubal T, Bapat R
    Am J Med, 2017 Nov;130(11):e493-e494.
    PMID: 28602875 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.05.020
  5. Chaubal T, Bapat R, Wadkar P
    QJM, 2017 Dec 01;110(12):841-842.
    PMID: 29025105 DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcx164
  6. Sadaphule R, Chaubal T, Bapat R, Wadkar P
    QJM, 2017 Oct 01;110(10):685.
    PMID: 29087529 DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcx132
  7. Arora S, Bapat RA, Chaubal T
    Am J Med Sci, 2018 12;356(6):e43.
    PMID: 30278877 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.07.009
  8. Kanneppady SK, Kanneppady SS, Chaubal T, Bapat R
    QJM, 2018 Oct 01;111(10):753-754.
    PMID: 29788120 DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcy100
  9. Wei SSK, Bapat R, Chaubal T
    Am J Med, 2019 10;132(10):e737.
    PMID: 31103649 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.04.039
  10. Kanneppady SS, Kanneppady SK, Chaubal T, Bapat R, Pandurangappa R, Oo AM, et al.
    Am J Med, 2019 04;132(4):e538-e539.
    PMID: 30503886 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.11.019
  11. Tan WY, Ng JZL, Ajit Bapat R, Vijaykumar Chaubal T, Kishor Kanneppedy S
    J Prosthet Dent, 2021 May;125(5):766.e1-766.e8.
    PMID: 33752904 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.018
    STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Lingual plate perforation can be life-threatening when vital structures are damaged during implant placement. Knowledge of the anatomy of lingual concavities is imperative for safe implant surgery.

    PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to determine the prevalence of type of posterior mandibular ridge morphology in a Malaysian population and to evaluate the buccolingual width of the alveolar ridge (Wb and Wc); alveolar ridge height (Vcb); and concavity angle, length, and depth for both left and right first and second molars in different age groups and sexes by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

    MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bilateral posterior mandibular lingual concavities at the first and second molars were retrospectively studied in cross-sectional views of 150 CBCT scans (n=600 sites evaluated). The sample size was calculated at a power of 80%, confidence interval of 95%, and margin of error of .05. The buccolingual width from the base and crest of the ridge and the ridge height were measured to determine the type of ridge. For the U-shaped ridge, the concavity angle, length, and depth were assessed. The independent t test was used to compare mean values of CBCT measurements between sexes and tooth type, while the ANOVA and Pearson chi-squared test were used to determine the correlations with age groups and types of ridge morphology, respectively. To compare the left and right readings for first and second molars in the same patient, the paired t test was performed (α=.05 for all tests).

    RESULTS: The Pearson correlation showed a strong agreement between the 2 examiners with an interobserver reliability of 87.3%. Significant difference was noted in all dimensional measurements when comparing right and left first and second molars (P

  12. Khanna D, Chaubal T, Bapat R, Abdulla AM, Philip ST, Arora S
    Afr Health Sci, 2019 Dec;19(4):3253-3263.
    PMID: 32127904 DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v19i4.50
    Background: Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CA-ex-PA) is extremely unusual in minor salivary glands of oral cavity. CAex-PA is a carcinomatous change as a primary or as a recurrence of pleomorphic adenoma.

    Objective: Due to resemblance of clinical symptoms of Ca ex PA and benign pleomorphic adenoma, it is mandatory for surgeons to keep high degree of clinical alertness, considering the peculiarity of this tumor.

    Case Report: 54-year-old male presented with swelling on left side in the pre-auricular region from the middle of zygomatic arch to mastoid process and from tragus of the ear up to angle of mandible. Fine needle aspiration cytology revealed a mixture of benign and malignant components. Total left parotidectomy with left radical neck dissection followed by reconstruction with cervicodeltopectoral flap was performed. Combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy were given to patient. Histologic examination and pre-operative fine needle aspiration cytology confirmed the diagnosis of Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CA-ex-PA). Two-year follow-up of patient showed no recurrence of the lesion.

    Conclusion: Due to the similarity in the clinical symptoms of CA-ex-PA and benign pleomorphic adenoma, it is vital that clinicians maintain a high degree of clinical vigilance, considering the oddity of this malignancy.

  13. Bapat RA, Parolia A, Chaubal T, Dharamadhikari S, Abdulla AM, Sakkir N, et al.
    Biomater Sci, 2021 May 04;9(9):3244-3283.
    PMID: 33949464 DOI: 10.1039/d1bm00233c
    Dental treatment is provided for a wide variety of oral health problems like dental caries, periodontal diseases, periapical infections, replacement of missing teeth and orthodontic problems. Various biomaterials, like composite resins, amalgam, glass ionomer cement, acrylic resins, metal alloys, impression materials, bone grafts, membranes, local anaesthetics, etc., are used for dental applications. The physical and chemical characteristics of these materials influence the outcome of dental treatment. It also impacts on the biological, allergic and toxic potential of biomaterials. With innovations in science and their positive results, there is also a need for awareness about the biological risks of these biomaterials. The aim of dental treatment is to have effective, yet safe, and long-lasting results for the benefit of patients. For this, it is important to have a thorough understanding of biomaterials and their effects on local and systemic health. Materials used in dentistry undergo a series of analyses before their oral applications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first and original review that discusses the reasons for and studies on the toxicity of commonly used biomaterials for applications in dentistry. It will help clinicians to formulate a methodical approach for the selection of dental biomaterials, thus providing an awareness for forecasting their risk of toxic reactions.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links