Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Alnaqi A, Burhamah W, Al-Sultan AT, Taqi E
    World J Surg, 2023 Feb;47(2):448-454.
    PMID: 36316513 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06788-3
    INTRODUCTION: Topical agents are sometimes applied to surgical wounds after closure; these may include antiseptics or antibiotics. Minimal research has been undertaken to investigate the effect of topical regimens on the tensile strength of suture materials.

    AIM: To investigate the effect of four commonly used wound care regimens on the tensile strength of suture materials.

    METHODS: The failure load of 9 different suture materials was tested using the Instron Electroplus E3000 tensile testing machine (Instron Corporation, Norwood, Massachusetts). Tensile strength was represented as the failure load, measured in Newtons (N), and defined as the maximal load that could be applied across the suture prior to failure. Each suture was tested dry and after immersion in one of 4 products for 7 days and tested on day 7. The immersion agents tested were: sodium chloride 0.9%, MicroSafe® (Sonoma Pharmaceuticals, Petaluma, CA), Aqueous Povidone-iodine 10% solution (Betadine-Mundipharma), and Fucidin ointment.

    RESULTS: Sodium chloride 0.9%, MicroSafe®, Aqueous Povidone-iodine 10%, and Fucidin seem to increase the failure load of most absorbable and non-absorbable sutures. However, the failure load of Polyglactin 910 suture (Surgilactin, coated, violet-Ethicon) is reduced by long-term exposure to either sodium chloride 0.9% or MicroSafe®, while the failure load of the Polydioxanone suture (PDS Plus-Ethicon) is reduced by long-term exposure to MicroSafe® only.

    CONCLUSION: In our experiment, the commonly used wound care products have been shown to alter the tensile strength of suture materials. Further human studies are required to ascertain the clinical validity and applicability of our findings.

  2. Alshawaf SM, Burhamah W, Alwazzan S, AlYouha S
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2023 Mar;11(3):e4824.
    PMID: 36875921 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004824
    Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a rapidly evolving field that has found its way into the medical field, providing unsurpassed contributions to the provision of patient-centered care. Its utilization lies in optimizing preoperative planning, the creation and customization of surgical guides and implants, and the designing of models that can be used to augment patient counseling and education. We integrate a simple yet effective method of scanning the forearm using an iPad device with Xkelet software to obtain a 3D printable stereolithography file, which is then incorporated to our suggested algorithmic model for designing a 3D cast, utilizing Rhinocerus design software and Grasshopper plugin. The algorithm implements a stepwise process of retopologizing the mesh, division of the cast model, creating the base surface, applying proper clearance and thickness to the mold, and creating a lightweight structure through the addition of ventilation holes to the surface with a joint connector between the two plates. In our experience, scanning and design of the patient-specific forearm cast using Xkelet and Rhinocerus, alongside implementing an algorithmic model through Grasshopper plugin has dramatically reduced the designing process from 2 to 3 hours to 4-10 minutes, further increasing the number of patient scans that can be sequenced in a short duration. In this article, we introduce a streamlined algorithmic process for the use of 3D scanning and processing software to create forearm casts that are tailored to the patients' dimensions. We emphasize the implementation of computer-aided design software for a quicker and more accurate design process.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links