Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Bello KE, Kelechi IJ, David ZA, Omebije AP, Shueb RH, Mustaffa N
    Malays J Med Sci, 2024 Aug;31(4):149-161.
    PMID: 39247116 DOI: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.12
    BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a significant global public health concern in Malaysia. It is a potentially life-threatening liver disease caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV), which can lead to long-term complications such as cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. In managing CHB, nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) have become the preferred treatment due to their ability to suppress viral replication and prevent disease progression. The question of liver-associated comorbidities related to patients with CHB on NAs remains unresolved in Malaysia despite the impending burden of CHB in the country. This study intends to address this and related aspects.

    METHOD: We assessed 136 CHB patients on NAs in one centre, the Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. Demographic and epidemiological data on the treatment, concomitant disease and monitoring strategies were collected and analysed.

    RESULT: Patients on NAs aged 50 years old-70 years old had the highest proportion of CHB (45.59%), with males representing 61.03% of that age group. There was a statistical significance in CHB acquisition and presence of comorbidities at P > 0.005. Our cohort displayed seven comorbidities (diabetes, obesity, rheumatoid diseases, renal impairment, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hypertension, non-hepatocellular malignancies and carcinoma); hypertension had the highest incidence (69.12%), while renal impairment had the lowest incidence (8.09%). Whole blood count, liver function and creatinine tests were the major monitoring tests used in over 90% of the cohort compared to viral load (6.1%).

    CONCLUSION: Diabetes, hypertension and obesity were independent risk factors for acquiring liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Malaysian CHB patients treated with NAs have several comorbidities that could affect disease outcomes. Therefore, careful monitoring is required.

  2. Al-Mhanna SB, Mohamed M, Noor NM, Afolabi HA, Irekeola AA, Bello KE, et al.
    Healthcare (Basel), 2022 Oct 26;10(11).
    PMID: 36360471 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10112130
    Background: Many COVID-19 patients presented with detrimental features, such as impaired respiratory function, physical capacity, and overall poor quality of life. The present study evaluates the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation on COVID-19 patients. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar from 2019 to 2021. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO with the registration number CRD42021273618. We performed statistical analyses via random effects and expressed the outcomes as standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous variables, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We included six trials involving 432 patients. The primary outcome showed a significant improvement in physical function (SMD 0.83, 95% CI −0.58 to 1.09; p < 0.001; four trials, 266 participants; high-quality evidence). There was significant difference in anxiety (SMD −0.80, 95% CI −1.23 to −0.37; p = 0.003), physical activity intensity levels (SMD −1.27, 95% CI −2.23 to −0.32; p = 0.009), sleep quality (MD −0.05, 95% CI −0.83 to −0.16; p = 0.004), peripheral muscle performance of lower limbs (SMD 0.90, 95% CI −0.60 to 1.20; p < 0.001), and dyspnoea outcomes (SMD −0.55, 95% CI −0.87 to −0.23; p = 0.007). Conclusions: Pulmonary rehabilitation is an effective adjuvant therapy that minimizes COVID-19 severity in the intervention group compared to the conventional treatment. The findings of this study will need to be considered in the framework of the clinical outcome as observed in the intervention outcome. Additionally, safer data on guideline rehabilitation would be needed to examine whether pulmonary rehabilitation would be a fruitful intervention to reduce COVID-19 severity.
  3. Bello KE, Irekeola AA, Al-Mhanna SB, Oseni OM, Omebije AP, Shueb RH, et al.
    Healthcare (Basel), 2023 Jan 16;11(2).
    PMID: 36673643 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11020275
    Background and Aim: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common infection in liver cirrhosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide detailed information on the prevalence of SBP among hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver cirrhosis globally. Methods: A systematic search for articles describing the prevalence of SBP in HBV and HCV-related cirrhosis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Our search returned ten (10) eligible articles involving 1713 viral cirrhosis cases representing eight (8) countries. A meta-analysis was performed on our eligible studies using the random effect model. A protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022321790). Results: The pooled prevalence of SBP in HBV-associated cirrhosis had the highest estimate [8.0% (95% CI, 2.7−21.0%; I2 = 96.13%; p < 0.001)], followed by SBP in HCV-associated liver cirrhosis [4.0% (95% CI, 1.3%−11.5%; I2 = 88.99%; p < 0.001)]. China (61.8%, CI: 57.1−66.3%), the USA (50.0%, CI: 34.6−65.4%), and Holland (31.1%, CI: 21.6−42.5%) had the highest estimate for SBP in HBV associated liver cirrhosis, SBP in HCV associated liver cirrhosis and SBP in HBV + HCV associated liver cirrhosis respectively. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of SBP in viral hepatitis-associated liver cirrhosis with the year of sampling and method of SBP detection at P < 0.001. There was an increase in SBP incidence at the beginning of 2016 across the liver cirrhosis in this study. Conclusion: The findings of this review revealed a rise in the incidence of SBP in viral hepatitis over the last decade. The latter indicates a possible future rise in the global prevalence of SBP among HBV and HCV-related liver cirrhosis.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links