MATERIALS AND METHODS: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted using videoconferencing. Fourteen medical officers working in public primary healthcare clinics from various regions of Malaysia were chosen using purposive sampling process, and participants underwent a total of seven paired in-depth interview (IDI) sessions. IDIs were video recorded, transcribed and subjected to interpretive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: The two main themes which emerged were the benefits and challenges of NCD teleconsultation service. Various categories relating to benefits of teleconsultation for NCD care are as follows: (1) Improved efficiency for patient care delivery (improved effectiveness, convenient, improved safety, better disease monitoring, patient empowerment) and (2) Benefits for Health Care Providers (improved healthcare and service delivery). Main challenges identified were as follows: (1) Challenges for Delivery of Care (Patients' adaptation in using teleconsultation service, Patients abusing the system, Poor digital literacy, No proper disease monitoring record), (2) Challenges for Health Care Providers (Lack of dedicated team and training, Higher workload and time-consuming) and (3) Challenges for Health Care System (Institutional policy, legal and regulatory weakness, Medical record documentation and prescription updates).
CONCLUSION: Optimisation of NCD patient healthcare delivery via teleconsultation is beneficial during and after pandemic. Targeted improvements to address current challenges are crucial to optimise its use beyond the pandemic period in the Malaysian public healthcare system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reviews of CRC Screening Registry and medical case record were conducted on patients who underwent CRC screening program at Klinik Kesihatan Mahmoodiah, Johor Bahru (KKMJB) from 2016 to 2018 period. Sociodemographic data, clinical profile of patients, iFOBT results and colonoscopy outcomes were extracted for analysis. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed using IBM SPSS version 25.
RESULTS: Out of 591 registered patients, 584 were included for analysis. Majority of the screened individuals were males (2016-2017) compared to females (2018). Chinese were most screened individuals in 2016 [94 (46.8%)] and 2017[87 (61.7%)]. Percentage of patients with appropriate indicators for screening and underwent colonoscopy for positive iFOBT were highest recorded in 2018 (74.7%, 58.8% respectively). Prevalence of CRC among those screened with iFOBT was 1 per cent for 2017 and 2018. Adherence to annual screening with iFOBT ranged between 1.1% (2016)- 2.2% (2018). Significant association observed between gender and iFOBT results, χ2(df)= 4.747, p=0.029 (2018). Median age and ethnicity were not significantly associated with iFOBT results (p>0.05) CONCLUSION: Screening for CRC among average risk groups in primary care should focus on recruiting female patients/clients as an organised activity. Prevalence of CRC detected from screening with iFOBT was 1 per cent. CRC screening programs should focus on proportion of iFOBT positive patients progressing to receive definitive colonoscopy and complying to annual surveillance screening.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted online, using Google FormTM recruited 207 Medical Officers from 14 public primary health centres, with a response rate of 74%. The Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Questionnaire for Family Physicians (KAPQFP) was used to assess PCPs' knowledge, attitude and practice in dementia care. Items in each domain were scored on a 4-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 to 4. Each domain's mean score was divided by 4 and converted to a scale of 100, with higher scores indicating better knowledge, attitude and practice. Bivariate analyses were conducted to determine the factors associated with cognitive evaluation practice.
RESULTS: The overall mean practice score was 3.53±0.52 (88.3%), which is substantially higher than the mean score for perceived competency and knowledge of 2.46±0.51 (61.5%). The mean score for attitude towards dementia and collaboration with nurses and other healthcare professionals was 3.36±0.49 (84.0%) and 3.43±0.71 (85.8%), respectively. PCPs with prior dementia training showed better practice (p=0.006), as did PCPs with longer primary care work experience (p=0.038). A significant positive association was found between knowledge-practice ((rs=0.207, p=0.003), attitude towards dementia practice ((rs=0.478, p<0.001), and attitude towards collaboration with other healthcare professionals-practice (rs= 0.427, p<0.001). Limited time and inadequate knowledge regarding dementia diagnosis and cognitive evaluation tools were among the reasons cognitive evaluations were not performed.
CONCLUSION: PCPs demonstrated better practice of cognitive evaluation, as compared to their knowledge and attitude. Given that their perceived competency and knowledge on dementia diagnosis is low and is positively associated with their practice, it is crucial to implement a comprehensive dementia training to enhance their knowledge and confidence on early detection of cognitive decline and cognitive evaluation in order to achieve better dementia detection in primary care.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative study involved five public healthcare clinics in the Kuching district with indepth interviews (IDI) conducted on 14 primary care doctors (PCDs). Semi-structured interviews and in-depth discussions were conducted via videoconferencing. One representative was selected from each clinic at initiation, followed by snowball method for subsequent subject selection until saturation of themes. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and analysis based on framework analysis principles via NVivo software. Themes were analysed deductively according to study objectives and evidence from literature.
RESULTS: Three main themes emerged from the IDI: (1) The perception of depression in elderly patients, (2) The perceived barriers to screening, and (3) The screening processes. Majority of the PCDs perceived depression as part of ageing process. Time constraints, lack of privacy in consultation rooms, dominant caregivers and failure to recognise recurrent somatic symptoms as part of depression influenced PCDs decision to screen. Screening was technically challenging for PCDs to use the DASS-21, which was not socio-culturally validated for local native population. Only 21.4% of respondents (3/14) reported screening at least three out 10 elderly patients seen over 1- month period. During the covid pandemic, due to the same human resource support and practices, most participants thought their screening for depression in elderlies had not changed.
CONCLUSION: Awareness of depression among PCDs needs to be re-enforced via continuous medical education programs to use appropriate screening tools, address infrastructure related barriers to optimise screening practices. The use of appropriate locally validated and socio-culturally adapted tool is vital to correctly interpret the screening test for patients.