METHODS: Medical records of patients who were treated for LM in the Paediatric Surgical Centre Universitas Gadjah Mada from January 2015 to January 2019 were reviewed. Scoring systems were used to assess the outcomes, including reduction of size, problems of aesthetics, functional problems, complications, necessity of further interventions, and interventions' frequencies.
RESULTS: During the four-year study, we included 31 children, consisting of 6, 5, and 20 patients in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. The total score did not significantly differ between Groups I, II, and III (14.67±2.80 vs. 13.40±2.07 vs. 12.50±1.47, respectively; p=0.056). Group II scored better in aesthetic problems than other groups (p=0.001), Group III scored higher in necessity of further interventions compared to the other groups (p=0.026), and Group I was higher in interventions' frequencies than the other groups (p<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in reduction of size, functional problems, and complications among groups (p=0.554, 0.151, and 0.076, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant different effect of the three modalities treatment for LM, although one group might have more beneficial effects compared with the other groups due to different scoring system parameters. Further multicentre and prospective cohort studies with a larger number of patients are necessary to establish the existence and extent of our findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational retrospective study was conducted using medical records of paediatric patients with EA at our institution from January 2014 to December 2020.
RESULTS: A total of 53 children with EA were included in the study. Log-rank analysis showed that definitive surgery and thrombocytopenia were significantly associated with the survival of children with EA, with a p-value of 0.007 and 0.002, respectively, whereas, sex, EA type, pneumonia and sepsis were not (p = 0.898, 0.919, 0.255, and 0.499, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that thrombocytopenia and definitive surgery were strongly associated with the survival of children with EA with a pvalue of 0.014 (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.22-5.85]) and 0.022 (HR =0.39 [95% CI = 0.17- 0.87]), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that thrombocytopenia might increase mortality, while definitive surgery might be beneficial for the survival of paediatric patients with EA. It implies that definitive surgery should be performed as early as necessary to prevent further morbidity and mortality. Our study comprehensively provides the survival of children with EA and links it to prognostic variables in a particular developing country. It serves as a potential research project that can be applied to the clinical setting to help clinicians manage EA better.