METHODS: CSF samples were collected from 2 neurosurgical centers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, between January 2022 and October 2023. Conventional markers and CLGR were quantified using standard laboratory methods, with BGA utilized for measurement when feasible. Samples were categorized into confirmed CBI-positive (CBI+) and CBI-negative (CBI-) groups. Marker performance was compared, and receiver operating characteristic analysis conducted. Pearson correlation assessed the agreement between BGA and laboratory measurements.
RESULTS: Among the 130 CSF samples, 11 were CBI+. Both cerebrospinal fluid lactate (cLac) and CLGR were significantly elevated in the CBI + group (P < 0.001). The area under the curve for cLac and CLGR was 0.990 and 0.994, respectively. Using a cutoff of 6.0 mmol/L, cLac demonstrated sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93.3%, positive predictive value of 57.9%, negative predictive value of 100%, and diagnostic accuracy of 93.9%. CLGR ≥20.0 showed even higher accuracy: 100.0% sensitivity, 98.6% specificity, 84.6% positive predictive value, 100% negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of 98.5%. Both markers maintained excellent performance in blood-stained CSF. BGA measurements correlated well with laboratory results (r = 0.980 and 0.999, respectively, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: CLac levels ≥6.0 mmol/L and CLGR ≥20.0 accurately identified CBI in neurosurgical patients, with CLGR exhibiting superior efficacy. The potential for instant BGA measurement suggests promise for point-of-care testing.
METHOD: For designing and modeling the DSPN severity grading systems for MNSI, 19 years of data from Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) clinical trials were used. Different Machine learning-based feature ranking techniques were investigated to identify the important MNSI features associated with DSPN diagnosis. A multivariable logistic regression-based nomogram was generated and validated for DSPN severity grading using the best performing top-ranked MNSI features.
RESULTS: Top-10 ranked features from MNSI features: Appearance of Feet (R), Ankle Reflexes (R), Vibration perception (L), Vibration perception (R), Appearance of Feet (L), 10-gm filament (L), Ankle Reflexes (L), 10-gm filament (R), Bed Cover Touch, and Ulceration (R) were identified as important features for identifying DSPN by Multi-Tree Extreme Gradient Boost model. The nomogram-based prediction model exhibited an accuracy of 97.95% and 98.84% for the EDIC test set and an independent test set, respectively. A DSPN severity score technique was generated for MNSI from the DSPN severity prediction model. DSPN patients were stratified into four severity levels: absent, mild, moderate, and severe using the cut-off values of 17.6, 19.1, 20.5 for the DSPN probability less than 50%, 75%-90%, and above 90%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this work provide a machine learning-based MNSI severity grading system which has the potential to be used as a secondary decision support system by health professionals in clinical applications and large clinical trials to identify high-risk DSPN patients.
METHODS: This study uses a mixed methods design. It focuses primarily on qualitative data to understand processes and strategies and to identify specific areas that can be improved through stakeholder engagement in the screening program. Quantitative data play a dual role in supporting the selection of participants for the qualitative study based on program monitoring data and assessing inequalities in screening and program implementation in healthcare facilities in Malaysia. Meanwhile, literature review identifies existing strategies to improve colorectal cancer screening. Additionally, the knowledge-to-action framework is integrated to ensure that the research findings lead to practical improvements to the colorectal cancer screening program.
DISCUSSION: Through this complex mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, this study will explore the complex interplay of population- and systems-level factors that influence screening rates. It involves identifying barriers to effective colorectal cancer screening in Malaysia, comparing current strategies with international best practices, and providing evidence-based recommendations to improve the local screening program.