METHODS: Illumina whole genome sequencing was performed on eight carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolated from a Malaysian hospital. Genetic diversity was inferred from the assembled genomes based on in silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST). In addition, plasmid-derived and chromosome-derived contigs were predicted using the machine learning approach. After genome annotation, genes associated with carbapenem resistance were identified based on similarity searched against the ResFinder database.
RESULTS: The eight K. pneumoniae isolates were grouped into six different sequence types, some of which were represented by a single isolate in the MLST database. Genomic potential for carbapenem-resistance was attributed to the presence of plasmid-localised blaNDM (blaNDM-1/blaNDM-5) or blaKPC (blaKPC-2/blaKPC-6) in these sequenced strains. The majority of these carbapenem resistance genes was flanked by repetitive (transposase or integrase) sequences, suggesting their potential mobility. This study also reported the first blaKPC-6-harbouring plasmid contig to be assembled for K. pneumoniae, and the second for the genus Klebsiella.
CONCLUSION: This study reported the first genomic resources for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae from Malaysia. The high diversity of carbapenem resistance genes and sequence types uncovered from eight isolates from the same hospital is worrying and indicates an urgent need to improve the genomic surveillance of clinical K. pneumoniae in Malaysia.
MATERIALS & METHODS: A total of 13,098 Enterobacteriaceae isolates from various clinical samples were sent to our laboratory between January 2011 and December 2012. Of these, 90 demonstrated reduced susceptibility to at least one carbapenem and were included in this study. Only 88 isolates were successfully subcultured on blood agar (BA). Another 2 isolates failed to grow and were excluded. Of the 88, 2 isolates had the same identification number (repetitive isolates); therefore, 1 isolate was excluded from further analyses. Only 87 isolates were subjected to molecular detection of the blaOXA-48 and blaOXA-181 genes by polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS: Eighty-seven non-repetitive isolates grew following subculture on BA. Of these, 9 (10.34%) were positive for OXA-48 (7 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 2 Escherichia coli). Each isolate originated from different patients. All patients had a history of treatment with at least one cephalosporin and/or carbapenem prior to the isolation of OXA-48 CRE. OXA-181 was detected in one (1.15%) out of the 87 isolates; CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of OXA-48 and OXA-181 CRE among all Enterobacteriaceae isolates in our institution is 0.069% and 0.008%, respectively. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that OXA-48 and OXA-181 carbapenemases appear to be important and possibly under-recognised causes of carbapenem resistance in Malaysia.
Objectives: This study was conducted to detect the biofilm formation in bacterial isolates from chronic wound infections.
Materials and Methods: In the present study, ninety two isolates from chronic wound infections were identified by MALDI-TOF-MS (bioMerieux) and VITEK-2-MS (bioMerieux). These isolates were further screened for biofilm formation by three methods i. e., Tissue Culture Plate method (TCP), Tube Method (TM) and Congo Red Agar (CRA) method. Impact of biofilm production was correlated with the antibiotic resistant pattern.
Statistical Analysis: Statistical analysis was done for all three methods considering TCP as Gold Standard and parameters like senitivity and specificity of TM i.e. 47.2 and 100% respectively.
Results: Out of 92 isolates, biofilm formation was seen in 72 isolates (78.2%) by TCP method. 64 isolates were strong biofilm producers, 8 isolates were moderate biofilm producers and 20 isolates were nonbiofilm producing. High prevalence of biofilm formation was seen in nonhealing ulcers infected with Staphylococcus aureus followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Conclusion: Among three screening methods used for detection of biofilm production, TCP method is considered to be a standard and most reliable for screening of biofilm formation in comparison to TM and CRA.