METHODS: Doctors from multiple disciplines in a general hospital were invited to complete a 39-item self-reported questionnaire between November 2020 and December 2020. Each question was based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). 'Agree' and 'strongly agree' were considered correct or positive responses, except for nine questions worded in the opposite direction. Associations between variables were confirmed using Pearson's chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests.
RESULTS: Most respondents were house officers (206/321; 64.2%) with less than two years of service, followed by medical officers (68/321; 21.2%) and specialists (47/321; 14.6%). Only 7.2% of the respondents had received formal palliative care training before the study. Of the respondents, 73.5% were aware of the World Health Organization (WHO) analgaesic ladder, 60.7% were correct on oral morphine as the first line for moderate to severe cancer pain treatment and 91.9% knew the need to add rescue morphine for breakthrough pain. Additionally, 34.0% (P < 0.001) perceived morphine use caused addiction, 57.9% (n = 186) expressed fear of respiratory depression and 18.3% of medical officers and specialists perceived limited access and a maximum dose to prescribe. There was a significant difference in knowledge and perception between junior doctors and senior clinicians. The majority strongly agreed and agreed that there were inadequate training opportunities in cancer pain management.
CONCLUSION: Inconsistent knowledge and negative perceptions of cancer pain management among doctors were demonstrated in this study.
METHODS: To verify this hypothesis, a computational model was developed to simulate the thermochemical processes involved during TCA with sequential injection. Four major processes that take place during TCA were considered, i.e., the flow of acid and base, their neutralisation, the release of exothermic heat and the formation of thermal damage inside the tissue. Equimolar acid and base at 7.5 M was injected into the tissue intermittently. Six injection intervals, namely 3, 6, 15, 20, 30 and 60 s were investigated.
RESULTS: Shortening of the injection interval led to the enlargement of coagulation volume. If one considers only the coagulation volume as the determining factor, then a 15 s injection interval was found to be optimum. Conversely, if one places priority on safety, then a 3 s injection interval would result in the lowest amount of reagent residue inside the tissue after treatment. With a 3 s injection interval, the coagulation volume was found to be larger than that of simultaneous injection with the same treatment parameters. Not only that, the volume also surpassed that of radiofrequency ablation (RFA); a conventional thermal ablation technique commonly used for liver cancer treatment.
CONCLUSION: The numerical results verified the hypothesis that shortening the injection interval will lead to the formation of larger thermal coagulation zone during TCA with sequential injection. More importantly, a 3 s injection interval was found to be optimum for both efficacy (large coagulation volume) and safety (least amount of reagent residue).
DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the cut-off values of BMI with optimum sensitivity and specificity for the detection of three cardiovascular risk factors: diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia. Gender-specific logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between BMI and these cardiovascular risk factors.
SETTING: All fourteen states in Malaysia.
SUBJECTS: Malaysian adults aged ≥18 years (n 32 703) who participated in the Third National Health and Morbidity Survey in 2006.
RESULTS: The optimal BMI cut-off value for predicting the presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia or at least one of these cardiovascular risk factors varied from 23.3 to 24.1 kg/m2 for men and from 24.0 to 25.4 kg/m2 for women. In men and women, the odds ratio for having diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia or at least one cardiovascular risk factor increased significantly as BMI cut-off point increased.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that BMI cut-offs of 23.0 kg/m2 in men and 24.0 kg/m2 in women are appropriate for classification of overweight. We suggest that these cut-offs can be used by health professionals to identify individuals for cardiovascular risk screening and weight management programmes.