Methods: Nineteen private general practitioners in Selangor and Kuala Lumpur participated in in-depth interviews in 2015. A topic guide was used for interview navigation. Participants were asked to discuss their experiences and approaches in managing pregnant adolescents. We used purposive sampling to recruit consenting private general practitioners who had experience in managing adolescent pregnancy. The verbatim transcripts of the audio-recorded interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Data reached saturation at the nineteenth in-depth interview. Results: Two themes emerged. Under the theme 'inadvertent advocator,' participants described their tasks with regards to building trust, calming angry parents and delivering comprehensive counseling and care related to the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents, including requests for abortions. Theme two, 'challenges of private general practitioners,' refers mainly to personal and religious conflicts arising from a request for an abortion and deficiencies in support and multidisciplinary integration within their practice settings.
Conclusion: General practitioners practicing in the private sector identify themselves as active players in supporting pregnant adolescents but face many challenges arising from the personal, religious, professional and community levels. Addressing these challenges is important for optimal care delivery to pregnant adolescents in this community.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility of TV-NOSE in live donor nephrectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 53 patients received LDN surgery at our hospital from September 2017 to December 2021. Retrospectively, living donor nephrectomy with TV-NOSE was compared to three different surgical procedures with standard specimen extraction.
RESULTS: 53 donor patients were included: 15 open (OLDN), 12 retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy (RPLDN), 10 transperitoneal living donor nephrectomy (TPLDN), and 16 standard laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy with transvaginal extraction (SLLDN TV-NOSE). SLLDN TVNOSE's longer operating time (p<0.0041) did not affect graft function. SLLDN TV-NOSE and RPLDN had shorter lengths of stay and better VAS trends than open LDN and TPLDN (p<0.05). SLLDN TV-NOSE donors reported acceptable surgical outcomes and unchanged sexual function. All patients had similar discharge creatinine levels, with 1-year transplant survival of 98% and just 1 graft loss in the TPLDN group.
CONCLUSION: SLLDN TV-NOSE is equivalent to RPLDN and better than open LDN and TPLDN in terms of duration of stay, VAS score, surgical outcomes, and sexual function. TVNOSE is a safe surgical procedure with an acceptable donor complication. TV-NOSE may be safely conducted in both developed and developing countries with proper patient selection.