MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, observational crosssectional survey was conducted from 1st May 2022 to 31st December 2022 at the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur. This survey included all neurosurgical patients aged 18 and above requiring urgent and semiemergency surgery. The next of kin were interviewed using a standardised questionnaire to obtain their perspectives on the effectiveness of the current consenting process, as well as to explore potential alternative methods for obtaining consent. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics.
RESULTS: The survey had 103 responses. The analysis revealed that the most common semi-emergency surgical procedures were craniotomy (22 cases) and external ventricular drain insertion (18 cases), followed by burr hole and drainage (14 cases). The most common primary diagnosis that needed urgent intervention was acute hydrocephalus. Interestingly, more than half of the patients (58 cases, 56.3%) had to wait for over 30 minutes to obtain consent from their next of kin prior to surgery. The next of kin interviewed had an age range of 25 to 72 years. The relationships of the next of kin were children (33 subjects), spouses (26 subjects), siblings (25 subjects), and parents (16 subjects) of the patients. Additionally, 96.1% of the respondents owned a smartphone with a mobile internet data connection, and 85.4% had internet connectivity at home. The most preferred method of telecommunication for this exercise was via WhatsApp. An interesting finding was the association between the level of trust in medical professionals and the preferred consent method. It was discovered that individuals who preferred physical consent had lower trust in the hospital and doctors, while those who preferred remote consent had higher trust.
CONCLUSION: The urban Malaysian population are ready to embrace telecommunication for next-of-kin consent in semiemergency neurosurgical scenarios. These findings form a precursor to further studies to develop algorithms for a secure remote digital surgical consenting platform for urgent or semi-emergency surgical cases.
AIM: We aimed to report the largest number of COVID-19-positive cases in KTR in a single center and to discuss their demographics, management, and evolution.
METHODS: We enrolled all the two thousand KTR followed up in our center in Kuwait and collected the data of all COVID-19-positive KTR (104) from the start of the outbreak till the end of July 2020 and have reported the clinical features, management details, and both patient and graft outcomes.
RESULTS: Out of the one hundred and four cases reported, most of them were males aged 49.3 ± 14.7 years. Eighty-two of them needed hospitalization, of which thirty-one were managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Main comorbidities among these patients were hypertension in 64.4%, diabetes in 51%, and ischemic heart disease in 20.2%. Management strategies included anticoagulation in 56.7%, withdrawal of antimetabolites in 54.8%, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal in 33.7%, the addition of antibiotics in 57.7%, Tocilizumab in 8.7%, and antivirals in 16.3%. During a follow-up of 30 days, the reported number of acute kidney injury (AKI) was 28.7%, respiratory failure requiring oxygen therapy 46.2%, and overall mortality rate was 10.6% with hospital mortality of 13.4% including an ICU mortality rate of 35.5%.
CONCLUSION: Better outcome of COVID-19-positive KTR in our cohort during this unremitting stage could be due to the younger age of patients and early optimized management of anticoagulation, modification of immunosuppression, and prompt treatment of secondary bacterial infections. Mild cases can successfully be managed at home without any change in immunosuppression.