Disseminated microsporidiosis is a life-threatening disease resulting from the haematogenous spread of microsporidia species. The diagnosis is challenging owing to its subtle nonspecific clinical presentation, which usually reflects the underlying organ involved. Therefore, a high index of suspicion is required for early diagnosis. Besides, tools for confirmatory laboratory diagnosis are limited. Currently, there is no direct diagnostic method that can detect the infection without involving invasive procedures. Clinical confirmation of disseminated microsporidiosis is usually based on light and transmission electron microscopy of infected tissue specimens. These are then followed by species detection using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Disseminated microsporidiosis shows the potential to be cleared up by albendazole or fumagillin if they are detected and treated early. Based on a series of case reports, this review aims to present a current update on disseminated microsporidiosis with emphasis on the clinical manifestations based on the organ system infected, diagnostic approach and treatment of this devastating condition.
Diagnosis of extraintestinal microsporidiosis is always hampered due to non-specific symptoms and difficulty in diagnosis. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic utility of blood and faecal-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect microsporidiosis in immunocompromised patients. A total of 42 immunocompromised patients consisting of HIV-infected and chemotherapy-treated patients were enrolled. Paired faecal and blood samples were collected and subjected to PCR to detect Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon spp. Faecal samples were microscopically screened for microsporidia spores. Overall, 42.9% (18/42) of patients were positive for microsporidiosis. Of this, 19.0% (8/42) and 4.8% (2/42) were positive by blood and stool PCR respectively. Meanwhile, 33.3% (14/42) of the faecal specimens were microscopically positive. Among the positive patients, 22.2% (4/18) had microsporidia confirmed by blood PCR and stool microscopy, suggestive of dissemination. Interestingly, the stool specimen in which microsporidia spores were detected via microscopy is not positive via PCR method. This highlights the limitation of the faecal-based detection method and the important use of blood samples for diagnosing extraintestinal microsporidiosis. Only E. bieneusi species were detected in all PCR-positive samples. This study highlights the diagnostic value of blood PCR in diagnosing extraintestinal microsporidiosis infections.