Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Burchert H, Lapidaire W, Williamson W, McCourt A, Dockerill C, Woodward W, et al.
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2023 May 01;207(9):1227-1236.
    PMID: 36459100 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202205-0858OC
    Rationale: Premature birth is an independent predictor of long-term cardiovascular risk. Individuals affected are reported to have a lower rate of [Formula: see text]o2 at peak exercise intensity ([Formula: see text]o2PEAK) and at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold ([Formula: see text]o2VAT), but little is known about their response to exercise training. Objectives: The primary objective was to determine whether the [Formula: see text]o2PEAK response to exercise training differed between preterm-born and term-born individuals; the secondary objective was to quantify group differences in [Formula: see text]o2VAT response. Methods: Fifty-two preterm-born and 151 term-born participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to 16 weeks of aerobic exercise training (n = 102) or a control group (n = 101). Cardiopulmonary exercise tests were conducted before and after the intervention to measure [Formula: see text]o2PEAK and the [Formula: see text]o2VAT. A prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted by fitting an interaction term for preterm and term birth histories and exercise group allocation. Measurements and Main Results: For term-born participants, [Formula: see text]o2PEAK increased by 3.1 ml/kg/min (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 4.4), and the [Formula: see text]o2VAT increased by 2.3 ml/kg/min (95% CI, 0.7 to 3.8) in the intervention group versus controls. For preterm-born participants, [Formula: see text]o2PEAK increased by 1.8 ml/kg/min (95% CI, -0.4 to 3.9), and the [Formula: see text]o2VAT increased by 4.6 ml/kg/min (95% CI, 2.1 to 7.0) in the intervention group versus controls. No significant interaction was observed with birth history for [Formula: see text]o2PEAK (P = 0.32) or the [Formula: see text]o2VAT (P = 0.12). Conclusions: The training intervention led to significant improvements in [Formula: see text]o2PEAK and [Formula: see text]o2VAT, with no evidence of a statistically different response based on birth history. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02723552).
  2. Williamson W, Lewandowski AJ, Huckstep OJ, Lapidaire W, Ooms A, Tan C, et al.
    EClinicalMedicine, 2022 Jun;48:101445.
    PMID: 35706495 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101445
    BACKGROUND: Exercise is advised for young adults with elevated blood pressure, but no trials have investigated efficacy at this age. We aimed to determine whether aerobic exercise, self-monitoring and motivational coaching lowers blood pressure in this group.

    METHODS: The study was a single-centre, open, two-arm, parallel superiority randomized clinical trial with open community-based recruitment of physically-inactive 18-35 year old adults with awake 24 h blood pressure 115/75mmHg-159/99 mmHg and BMI<35 kg/m2. The study took place in the Cardiovascular Clinical Research Facility, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. Participants were randomized (1:1) with minimisation factors sex, age (<24, 24-29, 30-35 years) and gestational age at birth (<32, 32-37, >37 weeks) to the intervention group, who received 16-weeks aerobic exercise training (three aerobic training sessions per week of 60 min per session at 60-80% peak heart rate, physical activity self-monitoring with encouragement to do 10,000 steps per day and motivational coaching to maintain physical activity upon completion of the intervention. The control group were sign-posted to educational materials on hypertension and recommended lifestyle behaviours. Investigators performing statistical analyses were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome was 24 h awake ambulatory blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) change from baseline to 16-weeks on an intention-to-treat basis. Clinicaltrials.gov registered on March 30, 2016 (NCT02723552).

    FINDINGS: Enrolment occurred between 30/06/2016-26/10/2018. Amongst the 203 randomized young adults (n = 102 in the intervention group; n = 101 in the control group), 178 (88%; n = 76 intervention group, n = 84 control group) completed 16-week follow-up and 160 (79%; n = 68 intervention group, n = 69 control group) completed 52-weeks follow-up. There were no group differences in awake systolic (0·0 mmHg [95%CI, -2·9 to 2·8]; P = 0·98) or awake diastolic ambulatory blood pressure (0·6 mmHg [95%CI, -1·4. to 2·6]; P = 0·58). Aerobic training increased peak oxygen uptake (2·8 ml/kg/min [95%CI, 1·6 to 4·0]) and peak wattage (14·2watts [95%CI, 7·6 to 20·9]) at 16-weeks. There were no intervention effects at 52-weeks follow-up.

    INTEPRETATION: These results do not support the exclusive use of moderate to high intensity aerobic exercise training for blood pressure control in young adults.

    FUNDING: Wellcome Trust, British Heart Foundation, National Institute for Health Research, Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links