MyMedR

Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

100% 5-Year Survival Rate in Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer is an Achievable Task

Chua PT, Lee CL, Huang KG

Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 2020 04 28;9(2):53.
PMID: 32676279 DOI: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_23_20
Fulltext Laparoscopic "Shaving" for Infiltrative External Adenomyosis of Bowel Muscularis and Concomitant Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis

Wu KL, Chua PT, Lee CL

Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 2021 11 05;10(4):265-267.
PMID: 34909388 DOI: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_27_20

Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is a common finding in patients diagnosed with adenomyosis. Women commonly present with severe, incapacitating dysmenorrhea. We report a case of severe dysmenorrhea and lower abdominal tightness for 4 years, diagnosed with posterior adenomyosis. The patient underwent surgery and DIE involving the rectosigmoid and coexisting uterocervical adenomyosis infiltrating bowel muscularis successfully diagnosed and treated using laparoscopic "shaving" technique. Dysmenorrhea significantly resolved after surgery. Laparoscopic surgical "shaving" technique for external adenomyosis infiltrating Rectosigmoid muscularis is feasible, where uterine preservation is desired.
Fulltext Standardization and experience may influence the survival of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer

Lee CL, Huang KG, Chua PT, Mendoza MCVR, Lee PS, Lai SY

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2021 May;60(3):463-467.
PMID: 33966729 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.03.013

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy has been shown to be associated with poorer outcome in an influential prospective, randomized trial. However, many centers worldwide performing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy have data and experience that prove otherwise. We aim to review surgical and oncologic outcomes of patients operated by Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in a tertiary hospital, by experienced surgeons and standardization in radicality, for cervical carcinoma Stage 1A1-1B1 from January 2009 to May 2014.
MATERIALS & METHODS: Standardised surgical technique with Parametrium & Paracolpium resection approach was adopted by qualified and experienced Gynecologic/Gyne-Oncologic Endoscopic & Minimally Invasive Surgeons in performing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer stage 1A1-1B1 from January 2009-May 2014, involving 53 patients. Electronic Medical Record system (EMR) Of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital(Tertiary Referral Centre), Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology was accessed for surgical and oncologic outcomes.
RESULTS: Fifty-Three patients operated from January 2009 to May 2014 were followed up for an average of 96.7 months with longest follow-up at 127 months. There were no cases of recurrence or death reported. 5 Year - Survival Rate and 5 Year Disease-Free Survival Rate were 100%. Two patients received post-operative pelvic radiation concurrent with chemotherapy using Cisplatin due to greater than 1/3 cervical stromal invasion.
CONCLUSION: It is vital to standardize minimally invasive surgical techniques for early stage cervical cancer, with focus on adequate radicality and resection which may contribute to excellent survival outcomes. Further international multi-center randomized trial (Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy In Cervical Cancer) will provide justification for continued practice of MIS in early stage cervical cancer.
Fulltext Cervical Cancer Surgery: Current State of Affairs

Yang FC, Huang W, Yang W, Liu J, Ai G, Luo N, et al.

Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 2021 04 30;10(2):75-83.
PMID: 34040965 DOI: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_81_20

Cervical cancer surgery has a history of more than 100-years whereby it has transitioned from the open approach to minimally invasive surgery (MIS). From the era of clinical exploration and practice, minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons have never ceased to explore new frontiers in the field of gynecologic surgery. MIS has fewer postoperative complications, including reduction of treatment-related morbidity and length of hospital stay than laparotomy; this forms the mainstay of treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. However, in November 2018, the New England Journal of Medicine had published two clinical studies on cervical cancer surgery (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer [LACC]). Following these publications, laparoscopic surgery for early-stage cervical cancer has come under intense scrutiny and negative perceptions. Many studies began to explore the concept of standardized surgery for early-stage cervical cancer. In this article, we performed a review of the history of cervical cancer surgery, outlined the standardization of cervical cancer surgery, and analyzed the current state of affairs revolving around cervical cancer surgery in the post-LACC era.