Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Ali IL, Yunus N, Abu-Hassan MI
    J Prosthodont, 2008 Oct;17(7):545-9.
    PMID: 18761582 DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00357.x
    This study compared the surface hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus of a light- and heat-cured urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) to two conventional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base resins. The effect of less-than-optimal processing condition on the hardness of internal and external surfaces of UDMA specimens was also investigated.
    Matched MeSH terms: Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives*
  2. Purmal K, Sukumaran P
    Aust Orthod J, 2010 Nov;26(2):184-8.
    PMID: 21175030
    To investigate the shear bond strengths of buccal tubes and to determine the sites of failure.
    Matched MeSH terms: Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives*
  3. Aldossary MS, Abu Hajia SS, Santini A
    Int Orthod, 2018 12;16(4):638-651.
    PMID: 30385291 DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2018.09.005
    OBJECTIVE: To measure Total Light Energy (TLE) Transmission through six makes of ceramic orthodontic brackets alone and bracket-plus-adhesive samples, using the MARC™-Resin Calibrator (RC).

    METHODS: Six makes, three each monocrystalline (M) and polycrystalline (P) were used; PureSapphire (M), SPA Aesthetic (M), Ghost (M), Mist (P), Reflections (P), and Dual Ceramic (P). The Ortholux™ Light Curing Unit (LCU) was used to cure the orthodontic adhesive Transbond™XT. The LCU's tip irradiance was measured and TLE transmitted through the ceramic bracket was obtained, then adhesive added to the bracket, and transmitted TLE measured through bracket-plus-adhesive samples. The LCU was set at five seconds as recommended for curing adhesive through ceramic brackets.

    RESULTS: Mean tip irradiance was 1859.2±16.2mW/cm2. The TLE transmitted through brackets alone ranged 1.7 to 3.9J/cm2, in the descending order: Ghost>Pure Sapphire>Reflections>Mist>SPA Aesthetics>Dual Ceramic. The TLE transmitted through bracket-plus-adhesive samples ranged 1.6 to 3.7J/cm2, in the descending order: Ghost>Mist>Reflections>Pure Sapphire>SPA Aesthetics>Dual Ceramic. TLE was reduced with the addition of adhesive (range -0.1 to -0.7J/cm2). There was a significant difference for Pure Sapphire, Reflections, and Mist (P<0.05), but not for SPA Aesthetics, Ghost, and Dual Ceramic. There was no overall significant difference between the monocrystalline and polycrystalline makes. The two best makes were of the monocrystalline type, concerning TLE transmission, but with the exception of polycrystalline Dual Ceramic; the next worst make was a monocrystalline bracket, SPA Aesthetics.

    CONCLUSION: Light energy attenuation through ceramic orthodontic brackets is make-dependent, with no overall difference between monocrystalline and polycrystalline brackets. Light energy is further attenuated with the addition of resin-based orthodontic adhesive.

    Matched MeSH terms: Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives
  4. Qadri GW, Noor SN, Mohamad D
    Pediatr Dent, 2009 Sep-Oct;31(5):389-94.
    PMID: 19947133
    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different repairing techniques of a fractured sealant on microleakage in vitro.
    Matched MeSH terms: Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives
  5. Elnafar AA, Alam MK, Hasan R
    J Orthod, 2014 Sep;41(3):201-7.
    PMID: 25143559 DOI: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000097
    The aim of this study was to assess the effects of four enamel preparation techniques on shear bond strength (SBS) of brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) and enamel surface roughness (Ra) were also investigated after cement removal.
    Matched MeSH terms: Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links